M.Sampath vs The Secretary on 25 April, 2013
In yet another decision reported in 2007-4-L.W. 361 S.Sivaparamam & 2 others v. The State of Tamil Nadu and four others, this Court has held as follows:-
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 5 of 5 (0.95 seconds)Documents citing
S. Sivaparamam vs The State Of Tamil Nadu on 18 July, 2007
N.S.Jaya vs The Secretary on 6 February, 2009
In Sivaparamam and 2 others V. The State of Tamil Nadu and 4 others (2007-4-L.W. 361), this Court had held as follows:
R. Srinivasan vs The Special Commissioner And ... on 2 March, 2011
12. The Supreme Court in similar circumstances in Angroori Devi smt. Vs. State of U.P. And others JT 2000 Supp.1 SC 295 held that when it is proved that possession under the principal Act was not taken in accordance with law, the subsequent repealing Act would abate all proceedings under the old Act. I have held in S. Sivaparamam vs. State of Tamil Nadu rep. by its Secretary, Revenue Department, Chennai (2007) 6 MLJ 1279 that in the absence of anything on record to show that physical possession of lands has been taken over by the Government, it is not possible to hold that the vesting has taken place even before the repeal Act coming into effect.
R.Ekambaram vs The Government Of Tamil Nadu on 30 November, 2012
In Sivaparamam and 2 others V. The State of Tamil Nadu and 4 others (2007-4-L.W. 361), this Court had held as follows:
Mrs.K.Jayalakshmi vs The Principal Commissioner And on 30 November, 2012
In Sivaparamam and 2 others V. The State of Tamil Nadu and 4 others (2007-4-L.W. 361), this Court had held as follows:
1