Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (1.00 seconds)
Documents citing Majid Hussain vs State Of Jk & Ors on 2 November, 2019

Afshana Anjum Baba vs 2 Wp(C) No. 1757/202 on 6 September, 2023

35. The aforesaid writ petition came to be followed in its footstep with institution of a writ petition WP(C) no. 3182/2019 titled "Majid Hussain Vs State & others" in which the inclusion of twelve (12) candidates, as figuring in the list of twenty eight (28) 21 WP(C) No. 1757/2021 c/w WP(C) No. 345/2022 finally shortlisted candidates out of written and interview, came to be questioned on the ground of lack of prescribed qualification/standard, both educational as well as physical. The petitioner Majid Hussain in the abovementioned writ petition is also one of candidates figuring in the list of forty (40). The candidates whose selection to figure in list of twenty eight (28) candidates came to be so questioned are as under:-
Jammu & Kashmir High Court - Srinagar Bench Cites 46 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Afshan Anjum Baba And Others vs Union Territory Of Jk And Others on 27 December, 2021

Mr Jahangir Iqbal Ganai, learned senior counsel appearing for the respondents 4 to 7, submits that the petitioners have no case on merit as no direction can be passed by the court against the law/ rules. He submits that the order passed by the Court staying the further recommendation of the selectees for appointment against the posts has violated their rights. He further submits that the Commission in terms of communication dated 27.08.2021 has already intimated the Forest Department that out of the 44 posts of Range Officers-Grade 1 (Territorial), 29 were selected for walk test/ Medical Test and 15 were recommended for appointment and in respect of the left out 13 candidates, the recommendation could not be made because of the pendency of the case before the CAT, but subsequently on the decision of the CAT, the Commission rejected the candidature of eight (08) candidates who could not fulfill the physical standard/ height. It is further submitted that the two candidates under OM category, who were earlier selected under ST Category but their recommendation was kept withheld for being respondents in the writ petition no. 3182/2019 titled Majid Hussain v. State & Others, the recommendation in respect of four more candidates was released in terms of the impugned judgment of the CAT. Mr Jahangir Iqbal, learned senior counsel, submits that the petitioners' case not meeting the physical standard (height) could not be recommended for appointment.
Jammu & Kashmir High Court - Srinagar Bench Cites 2 - Cited by 1 - A Magrey - Full Document
1