Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 17 (0.56 seconds)
Documents citing Kesar Singh vs State Of Punjab on 4 March, 1974

State Of Rajasthan vs Sahab Ram on 20 September, 1974

32. Last case referred to is Ediga Anamma v. State of Andhra Pradesh While referring to Jagmohan Singh's case , Krishna Iyer J observed that that case adjudged capital sentence constitutional and whatever our view of the social invalidity of the death penalty, personal predilections must bow to the law as by this court declared. He also quoted with approval the noble words of Justice Stanley Mosk of California uttered in a death sentence case:
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 16 - Cited by 9 - Full Document

Food Inspector vs N. Chandraiah on 31 January, 2003

In Kesar Singh v. State, 198.1 Cri LJ 488, Haldi power was found adulterated. The Allahabad High Court held that where the existence of relevant papers, report of Public Analyst etc., being in office of the sanctioning authority, prior to the according of sanction is proved, in the absence of any evidence to the contrary, it can be presumed that the sanction was granted after consideration of these papers and merely because the sanction was given in a cyclostyled form and while the blanks were filled in one ink and the signature of the sanctioning authority was in different ink, it could not, there fore, be said that office filled up these particulars and the sanctioning authority mechanically signed it without applying its mind to the facts of the case.
Andhra HC (Pre-Telangana) Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Kishori vs State (Nct) Of Delhi on 17 December, 1999

Considering the question as to the circumstances in which capital punishment can be imposed this Court took note of the decisions in-Macchi Singh v. State of Punjab, [1983] 3 SCC 470; Ajmer Singh v. State of Punjab, [1977] 1 SCC 659; State of U.P. v. Bhoora, [1998] 1 SCC 128; Hardayal v. State of U.P. [ 1976] 2 SCC 812; Balraj v. State of U.P., [1994] 4 SCC 29; Kesar Singh v. State of Punjab, [1974] 4 SCC 278; Ediga Canamma v. State of A.P. [1974] 4 SCC 443; Shivaji Genu Mohite v. State of Maharashtra, [1973] 3 SCC 219; Sarwan Singh v. State of Punjab, [1978] 4 SCC 111 and Shankar v. State of T.N., [1994] 4 SCC 478. This Court made the following observations:
Supreme Court of India Cites 28 - Cited by 14 - D P Mohapatra - Full Document
1   2 Next