Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 69 (1.57 seconds)
Documents citing Salam Samarjeet Singh vs High Court Of Manipur At Imphal And Anr on 7 October, 2016

Shaik Masthan Vali, Guntur Dist vs Kummaru Durga, Guntur Dist Three Others on 28 August, 2025

61. Following Sivanandan C.T. [Sivanandan C.T. v. High Court of Kerala, (2024) 3 SCC 799 : (2024) 1 SCC (L&S) 67 : 2023 INSC 709] , a three-Judge Bench of this Court in Salam Samarjeet Singh v. High Court of Manipur [Salam Samarjeet Singh v. High Court of Manipur, (2024) 14 SCC 179 : 2024 SCC OnLine SC 2316 : 2024 INSC 647] held : (Salam Samarjeet Singh case [Salam Samarjeet Singh v. High Court of Manipur, (2024) 14 SCC 179 : 2024 SCC OnLine SC 2316 : 2024 INSC 647] , SCC para 34) "34. ... Prescribing minimum marks for viva voce segment may be justified for the holistic assessment of a candidate, but in the present case such a requirement was introduced only after commencement of the recruitment process and in violation of the statutory rules. The decision of the Full Court to depart from the expected exercise of preparing the merit list as per the unamended rules is clearly violative of the substantive legitimate expectation of the petitioner. It also fails the tests of fairness, consistency and predictability and hence is violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India."
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 55 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Rajiya Sulthana, Hyderabad vs Vemula Punyavathi, Guntur Dist 3 Others on 28 August, 2025

61. YoWoWmgSivanandan C.T. [Sivanandan C.T. v. High Court of Kerala, (2024) 3 see 799 : (2024) 1 SCC (L&S) 67 : 2023 INSC 709] , a three-Judge Bench of this Court in Salam Samarjeet Singh v. High Court of Manipur \Salam Samarjeet Singh High Court of Manipur, (2024) 14 SCC 179 ; 2024 SCC OnLine SC 2316 : 2024 INSC 647] held : {Salam Samarjeet Singh case {Salam Samarjeet Singh v. High Court of Manipur, (2024) 14 SCC 179 : 2024 SCC OnLine SC 2316; 2024 INSC 647], SCC para 34) "3^. ... Prescribing minimum marks for viva voce segment may be justified for the holistic assessment of a candidate, but in the present case such a requirement was introduced only after commencement of the recruitment process and in violation of the statutory rules. The decision of the Full Court to depart from the expected exercise of preparing the merit list as per the unamended rules is clearly violative of the substantive legitimate expectation of the petitioner. It also fails the tests of fairness, consistency and predictability and hence is violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India." \ RNT, J & MRK, J
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 56 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Varanasi Satyanarayana vs Goddu Sitamahalakshmi on 28 August, 2025

61. YoWoWmgSivanandan C.T. [Sivanandan C.T. v. High Court of Kerala, (2024) 3 see 799 : (2024) 1 SCC (L&S) 67 : 2023 INSC 709] , a three-Judge Bench of this Court in Salam Samarjeet Singh v. High Court of Manipur \Salam Samarjeet Singh High Court of Manipur, (2024) 14 SCC 179 ; 2024 SCC OnLine SC 2316 : 2024 INSC 647] held : {Salam Samarjeet Singh case {Salam Samarjeet Singh v. High Court of Manipur, (2024) 14 SCC 179 : 2024 SCC OnLine SC 2316; 2024 INSC 647], SCC para 34) "3^. ... Prescribing minimum marks for viva voce segment may be justified for the holistic assessment of a candidate, but in the present case such a requirement was introduced only after commencement of the recruitment process and in violation of the statutory rules. The decision of the Full Court to depart from the expected exercise of preparing the merit list as per the unamended rules is clearly violative of the substantive legitimate expectation of the petitioner. It also fails the tests of fairness, consistency and predictability and hence is violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India." \ RNT, J & MRK, J
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 56 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Mohammed Nasirunnisa Begum vs Shaik Saleema 2 Others on 28 August, 2025

61. YoWoWmgSivanandan C.T. [Sivanandan C.T. v. High Court of Kerala, (2024) 3 see 799 : (2024) 1 SCC (L&S) 67 : 2023 INSC 709] , a three-Judge Bench of this Court in Salam Samarjeet Singh v. High Court of Manipur \Salam Samarjeet Singh High Court of Manipur, (2024) 14 SCC 179 ; 2024 SCC OnLine SC 2316 : 2024 INSC 647] held : {Salam Samarjeet Singh case {Salam Samarjeet Singh v. High Court of Manipur, (2024) 14 SCC 179 : 2024 SCC OnLine SC 2316; 2024 INSC 647], SCC para 34) "3^. ... Prescribing minimum marks for viva voce segment may be justified for the holistic assessment of a candidate, but in the present case such a requirement was introduced only after commencement of the recruitment process and in violation of the statutory rules. The decision of the Full Court to depart from the expected exercise of preparing the merit list as per the unamended rules is clearly violative of the substantive legitimate expectation of the petitioner. It also fails the tests of fairness, consistency and predictability and hence is violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India." \ RNT, J & MRK, J
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 56 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Gadiyaram Siddardha Sankar Das vs Kolakattala Siva Rami Reddy, on 28 August, 2025

61. YoWoWmgSivanandan C.T. [Sivanandan C.T. v. High Court of Kerala, (2024) 3 see 799 : (2024) 1 SCC (L&S) 67 : 2023 INSC 709] , a three-Judge Bench of this Court in Salam Samarjeet Singh v. High Court of Manipur \Salam Samarjeet Singh High Court of Manipur, (2024) 14 SCC 179 ; 2024 SCC OnLine SC 2316 : 2024 INSC 647] held : {Salam Samarjeet Singh case {Salam Samarjeet Singh v. High Court of Manipur, (2024) 14 SCC 179 : 2024 SCC OnLine SC 2316; 2024 INSC 647], SCC para 34) "3^. ... Prescribing minimum marks for viva voce segment may be justified for the holistic assessment of a candidate, but in the present case such a requirement was introduced only after commencement of the recruitment process and in violation of the statutory rules. The decision of the Full Court to depart from the expected exercise of preparing the merit list as per the unamended rules is clearly violative of the substantive legitimate expectation of the petitioner. It also fails the tests of fairness, consistency and predictability and hence is violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India." \ RNT, J & MRK, J
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 56 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

J.M.Bazul Ahhab vs The Vizianagaram Municipality 23 ... on 28 August, 2025

61. YoWoWmgSivanandan C.T. [Sivanandan C.T. v. High Court of Kerala, (2024) 3 see 799 : (2024) 1 SCC (L&S) 67 : 2023 INSC 709] , a three-Judge Bench of this Court in Salam Samarjeet Singh v. High Court of Manipur \Salam Samarjeet Singh High Court of Manipur, (2024) 14 SCC 179 ; 2024 SCC OnLine SC 2316 : 2024 INSC 647] held : {Salam Samarjeet Singh case {Salam Samarjeet Singh v. High Court of Manipur, (2024) 14 SCC 179 : 2024 SCC OnLine SC 2316; 2024 INSC 647], SCC para 34) "3^. ... Prescribing minimum marks for viva voce segment may be justified for the holistic assessment of a candidate, but in the present case such a requirement was introduced only after commencement of the recruitment process and in violation of the statutory rules. The decision of the Full Court to depart from the expected exercise of preparing the merit list as per the unamended rules is clearly violative of the substantive legitimate expectation of the petitioner. It also fails the tests of fairness, consistency and predictability and hence is violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India." \ RNT, J & MRK, J
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 56 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

J.M.Zainul Abdeen vs The Vizianagaram Municipality 10 ... on 28 August, 2025

61. YoWoWmgSivanandan C.T. [Sivanandan C.T. v. High Court of Kerala, (2024) 3 see 799 : (2024) 1 SCC (L&S) 67 : 2023 INSC 709] , a three-Judge Bench of this Court in Salam Samarjeet Singh v. High Court of Manipur \Salam Samarjeet Singh High Court of Manipur, (2024) 14 SCC 179 ; 2024 SCC OnLine SC 2316 : 2024 INSC 647] held : {Salam Samarjeet Singh case {Salam Samarjeet Singh v. High Court of Manipur, (2024) 14 SCC 179 : 2024 SCC OnLine SC 2316; 2024 INSC 647], SCC para 34) "3^. ... Prescribing minimum marks for viva voce segment may be justified for the holistic assessment of a candidate, but in the present case such a requirement was introduced only after commencement of the recruitment process and in violation of the statutory rules. The decision of the Full Court to depart from the expected exercise of preparing the merit list as per the unamended rules is clearly violative of the substantive legitimate expectation of the petitioner. It also fails the tests of fairness, consistency and predictability and hence is violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India." \ RNT, J & MRK, J
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 56 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Mohammed Amanuddin vs Perupogu Mariyakumari And 4 Others on 28 August, 2025

61. YoWoWmgSivanandan C.T. [Sivanandan C.T. v. High Court of Kerala, (2024) 3 see 799 : (2024) 1 SCC (L&S) 67 : 2023 INSC 709] , a three-Judge Bench of this Court in Salam Samarjeet Singh v. High Court of Manipur \Salam Samarjeet Singh High Court of Manipur, (2024) 14 SCC 179 ; 2024 SCC OnLine SC 2316 : 2024 INSC 647] held : {Salam Samarjeet Singh case {Salam Samarjeet Singh v. High Court of Manipur, (2024) 14 SCC 179 : 2024 SCC OnLine SC 2316; 2024 INSC 647], SCC para 34) "3^. ... Prescribing minimum marks for viva voce segment may be justified for the holistic assessment of a candidate, but in the present case such a requirement was introduced only after commencement of the recruitment process and in violation of the statutory rules. The decision of the Full Court to depart from the expected exercise of preparing the merit list as per the unamended rules is clearly violative of the substantive legitimate expectation of the petitioner. It also fails the tests of fairness, consistency and predictability and hence is violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India." \ RNT, J & MRK, J
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 56 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Nellore Masthanamma And Another vs Kommi Sankaraiah on 28 August, 2025

61. YoWoWmgSivanandan C.T. [Sivanandan C.T. v. High Court of Kerala, (2024) 3 see 799 : (2024) 1 SCC (L&S) 67 : 2023 INSC 709] , a three-Judge Bench of this Court in Salam Samarjeet Singh v. High Court of Manipur \Salam Samarjeet Singh High Court of Manipur, (2024) 14 SCC 179 ; 2024 SCC OnLine SC 2316 : 2024 INSC 647] held : {Salam Samarjeet Singh case {Salam Samarjeet Singh v. High Court of Manipur, (2024) 14 SCC 179 : 2024 SCC OnLine SC 2316; 2024 INSC 647], SCC para 34) "3^. ... Prescribing minimum marks for viva voce segment may be justified for the holistic assessment of a candidate, but in the present case such a requirement was introduced only after commencement of the recruitment process and in violation of the statutory rules. The decision of the Full Court to depart from the expected exercise of preparing the merit list as per the unamended rules is clearly violative of the substantive legitimate expectation of the petitioner. It also fails the tests of fairness, consistency and predictability and hence is violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India." \ RNT, J & MRK, J
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 56 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Rizwana Sulthana, Hyderabad vs Burri Anasuya, Guntur Jcjc 3 Others on 28 August, 2025

61. YoWoWmgSivanandan C.T. [Sivanandan C.T. v. High Court of Kerala, (2024) 3 see 799 : (2024) 1 SCC (L&S) 67 : 2023 INSC 709] , a three-Judge Bench of this Court in Salam Samarjeet Singh v. High Court of Manipur \Salam Samarjeet Singh High Court of Manipur, (2024) 14 SCC 179 ; 2024 SCC OnLine SC 2316 : 2024 INSC 647] held : {Salam Samarjeet Singh case {Salam Samarjeet Singh v. High Court of Manipur, (2024) 14 SCC 179 : 2024 SCC OnLine SC 2316; 2024 INSC 647], SCC para 34) "3^. ... Prescribing minimum marks for viva voce segment may be justified for the holistic assessment of a candidate, but in the present case such a requirement was introduced only after commencement of the recruitment process and in violation of the statutory rules. The decision of the Full Court to depart from the expected exercise of preparing the merit list as per the unamended rules is clearly violative of the substantive legitimate expectation of the petitioner. It also fails the tests of fairness, consistency and predictability and hence is violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India." \ RNT, J & MRK, J
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 56 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 Next