Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 32 (1.53 seconds)
Documents citing Prem Lata vs Ram Sarup on 27 September, 2005

Jaspal Singh vs Manjit Singh And Others on 25 October, 2013

Learned counsel for the petitioner also placed reliance upon Prem Lata v. Ram Sarup; 2005 (4) RCR (Civil) 423; passed by this Court, wherein, it was held that necessary documents per se admissible in evidence must be allowed to be produced, may be subject to costs. It was also held that law of procedure is handmaid of justice. It must be used to advance the cause of justice and to avoid causing injustice.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sonia Dhillon & Anr vs Tarlochan Singh & Ors on 11 November, 2014

8. Counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the copies of FIRs are already on record and only certified copies thereof have to be placed on record. He has relied upon Prem Lata Vs. Ram Sarup 2006(1) PLR 477, Pawan Kumar Vs. Raj Kumar and others 2007(1) PLR 761, Hans Raj Vs. Surinder Kaur and others 2010 (2) Civil Court Cases 377, Rajesh Kumar Vs. Mangat Rai and others 2012(2) PLR 334, Shahbad Coop. Sugar Mills Vs. M/s Markanda Sugar Traders and another 2012(4) Civil Court Cases 851 and PRADEEP KUMAR ARORA 2014.11.19 10:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh Civil Revision No.7472 of 2014 -4- **** Banwari Lal and others Vs. Saraswati and others 2014 (2) PLR 486.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - G S Sandhawalia - Full Document

Amrinder Singh vs Dashwinder Singh And Another on 15 November, 2010

Learned Single Judge of this Court in the matter of Prem Lata Vs. Ram Sarup reported in 2005(4) RCR (Civil) 423 placing reliance on judgment of the Division Bench of this Court in the matter of Batala Machine Tools Workshop Co- op. vs. Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Gurdaspur has held that matter can be disposed of at the stage of admission without any notice to the opposite party, because if the respondent is summoned to contest this litigation, it may involve huge expenditure and unnecessary harassment and delay of the proceedings.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - A Singh - Full Document

Ludhiana Improvement Trust vs Zora Singh on 18 November, 2010

Learned Single Judge of this Court in the matter of Prem Lata Vs. Ram Sarup reported in 2005(4) RCR (Civil) 423 placing reliance on judgment of the Division Bench of this Court in the matter of Batala Machine Tools Workshop Co- op. vs. Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Gurdaspur has held that matter can be disposed of at the stage of admission without any notice to the opposite party, because if the respondent is summoned to contest this litigation, it may involve huge expenditure and unnecessary harassment and delay of the proceedings.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - A Singh - Full Document

Navjot Singh And Another vs Smt. Kawaljit Kaur And Another on 18 November, 2010

Learned Single Judge of this Court in the matter of Prem Lata Vs. Ram Sarup reported in 2005(4) RCR (Civil) 423 placing reliance on judgment of the Division Bench of this Court in the matter of Batala Machine Tools Workshop Co-op. vs. Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Gurdaspur has held that matter can be disposed of at the stage of Civil Revision No.7514 of 2010 (O&M) -2- admission without any notice to the opposite party, because if the respondent is summoned to contest this litigation, it may involve huge expenditure and unnecessary harassment and delay of the proceedings.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 1 - A Singh - Full Document

Sarwan Singh vs Hardeep Singh And Others on 18 November, 2010

Civil Revision No.1308 of 2010 (O&M) -2- Learned Single Judge of this Court in the matter of Prem Lata Vs. Ram Sarup reported in 2005(4) RCR (Civil) 423 placing reliance on judgment of the Division Bench of this Court in the matter of Batala Machine Tools Workshop Co-op. vs. Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Gurdaspur has held that matter can be disposed of at the stage of admission without any notice to the opposite party, because if the respondent is summoned to contest this litigation, it may involve huge expenditure and unnecessary harassment and delay of the proceedings.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - A Singh - Full Document

Surinder Kumar And Others vs Satinder Kumar And Others on 18 November, 2010

Learned Single Judge of this Court in the matter of Prem Lata Vs. Ram Sarup reported in 2005(4) RCR (Civil) 423 placing reliance on Civil Revision No.3170 of 2010 (O&M) -2- judgment of the Division Bench of this Court in the matter of Batala Machine Tools Workshop Co-op. vs. Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Gurdaspur has held that matter can be disposed of at the stage of admission without any notice to the opposite party, because if the respondent is summoned to contest this litigation, it may involve huge expenditure and unnecessary harassment and delay of the proceedings.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - A Singh - Full Document

Darshan Singh And Others vs Ajit Singh And Others on 22 November, 2010

Learned Single Judge of this Court in the matter of Prem Lata Vs. Ram Sarup reported in 2005(4) RCR (Civil) 423 placing C.R. No. 7615 of 2010 2 reliance on judgment of the Division Bench of this Court in the matter of Batala Machine Tools Workshop Coop. vs. Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Gurdaspur has held that matter can be disposed of at the stage of admission without any notice to the opposite party, because if the respondent is summoned to contest this litigation, it may involve huge expenditure and unnecessary harassment and delay of the proceedings.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - A Singh - Full Document

Bhupinder Singh And Others vs Mohinder Singh on 26 November, 2010

Learned Single Judge of this Court in the matter of Prem Lata Vs. Ram Sarup reported in 2005(4) RCR (Civil) 423 placing reliance on judgment of the Division Bench of this Court in the matter of Batala Machine Tools Workshop Co- op. vs. Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Gurdaspur has held that matter can be disposed of at the stage of admission without any notice to the opposite party, because if the respondent is summoned to contest this litigation, it may involve huge expenditure and unnecessary harassment and delay of the proceedings.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - A Singh - Full Document
1   2 3 4 Next