Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 85 (1.96 seconds)
Documents citing Nirmala Devi vs The State Of Himachal Pradesh on 1 August, 2023

Nirmla Devi vs The State (Nct Of Delhi) on 18 February, 2025

DEV DEV 2025.02.18 14:46:07 +0530 CS SCJ 1060/19 Nirmla Devi Vs. State record are that Sh. Om Prakash, S/o Sh. Sham Lal has been missing since 24.05.2009. Thereafter, PW-2, Dilip gave missing complaint dated. 25.05.2009 at PS Bhajanpura vide DD No. 48B. Despite complaint, being lodged with the concerned authorities with respect to the same, police have not been able to trace Sh. Om Prakash, S/o Sh. Sham Lal. The said missing complaint has not been challenged or disputed by the defendants. Hence, the testimony of all the plaintiff's witnesses, clearly establishes that the plaintiff or her family members are not aware about the whereabouts of Sh. Om Prakash, S/o Sh. Sham Lal who has been missing since 24.05.2009. Therefore, for the past more than 10 years, Sh. Om Prakash has not been seen by any of the persons or heard of as alive by any of his relatives etc. who are supposed to know about him. Hence, counsel for plaintiff has relied U/s 108 Indian Evidence Act to seek declaration of Sh. Om Prakash as dead.
Delhi District Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Vikram Singh vs State Of Himachal Pradesh on 11 October, 2023

Yes 2 Cr.MP (M) No. 1371 of 2023 FIR as well as proclamation order dated 28.8.2020, pending adjudication in this High Court and CWP No. 3987 of 2019, titled as Nirmala Devi Vs. State of H.P. & others, decided on 22.5.2023, were also requisitioned and perused. Learned counsel for the complainant has also placed on record daily order sheets of CWP No. 3987 of 2019 and other documents with regard to termination of marriage of victim with Gagandeep Joshi.
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 32 - Cited by 0 - V S Thakur - Full Document

Mukesh Topno Son Of Late Lalo Topno vs The State Of Jharkhand on 4 March, 2024

17. The Supreme Court very recently, in the case of Nirmala Devi vs State of Himachal Pradesh reported in 2023 SCC OnLine SC 899 has altered the conviction from Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code to that of 304 part 1 of the Indian Penal Code and held that the possibility of the appellant causing the death of the deceased while being deprived of the power of self- control, due to the provocation on account of the deceased cannot be ruled out. The weapon used in the crime is a stick which was lying in the house, and which, by no means, can be called a deadly weapon. It will be also necessary to take into consideration the background in which the offence took place. There used to be persistent quarrels between the deceased and the appellant.
Jharkhand High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - A Sen - Full Document

Paramjeet Singh vs State Of Hp And Others on 24 April, 2024

in CWPOA No. 1833 of 2020 titled Asha Devi vs. State of HP, dated 22.7.2022 passed in CWPOA No. 6748 of 2019 titled Vikram vs State of HP, dated 23.8.2022 passed in CWPOA No. 7640 of 2019 titled Devinder vs. State of HP, dated 23.8.2022 passed in CWPOA No. 4111 of 2020 titled Gurpiari vs. State of HP, dated 21.09.2022 passed in CWPOA No 7632 of 2019 titled Sher Singh vs. State of HP, dated 1.5.2023 passed in CWPOA No. 7787 of 2019 titled Kusuma vs. State of HP, 1.5.2023 passed in CWPOA No.7819 of 2019, titled as Nirmala vs. State of HP, dated 1.5.2023 passed in CWPOA No. 7913 of 2019 titled Naresh vs. State of HP, and dated 6.7.2023 passed in CWPOA No.7932 of 2019 titled Chander Shekhar vs. State of HP.
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - V S Thakur - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next