Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (0.34 seconds)
Documents citing Rajinder Kumar And Ors. vs Soma Devi And Ors. on 12 May, 2000

D.T.C. & Ors. vs Meena Kumari & Anr. on 3 February, 2010

Some other decisions dealing with this aspect of the matter are Rajinder Kumar v. Soma Devi, 2001 ACJ 307 (HP); Chandan v. Kanwarlal, 1989 ACJ 816 (Delhi); Khairullah v. Anita 1994 ACJ 1017 (AP); Nankuram Sarajdin v. Member, M.A.C.T., Thane, 1994 (2) TAC 346 and Halki Bai v. New India Insurance Co. Ltd., MAC.APP.No.512-13/2006 & 570-71/2006 Page 16 of 22 1999 ACJ 187(MP). Learned Judges in these cases have consistently held that remarriage of a widow would not disentitle her to claim compensation.
Delhi High Court Cites 23 - Cited by 1 - J R Midha - Full Document

Dinesh Adhlak vs Pritam Singh & Ors. on 15 January, 2010

Some other decisions dealing with this aspect of the matter are Rajinder Kumar v. Soma Devi, 2001 ACJ 307 (HP); Chandan v. Kanwarlal, 1989 ACJ 816 (Delhi); Khairullah v. Anita 1994 ACJ 1017 (AP); Nankuram Sarajdin v. Member, M.A.C.T., Thane, 1994 (2) TAC 346 and Halki Bai v. New India Insurance Co. Ltd., 1999 ACJ 187(MP). Learned Judges in these cases have consistently held that remarriage of a widow would not disentitle her to claim compensation.
Delhi High Court Cites 25 - Cited by 36 - J R Midha - Full Document

Mst. Sakina Begum vs Akbar Shah And Ors. on 10 November, 2002

Some other decision dealing with this aspect of the matter are Rajinder Kumar and Ors. v. Soma Devi and Ors. 2001 ACJ 311; Chandan v. Kanwarlal 1989 ACJ 816; Khairullah v. Anita 1994 ACJ 1017, Nankuram Sarajdin v. member MACT Thane 1994 (2) TAC 346 and Halki Bai v. New Delhi Insurance co Ltd 1999 ACJ 187. The learned Judges in these cases have consistently held that remarriage of a widow would not disentitle her to claim compensation.
Jammu & Kashmir High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Seema Malik And Ors. vs Union Of India (Uoi) on 27 November, 2002

Some other decisions dealing with this aspect of the matter are Rajinder Kumar and Ors. v. Soma Devi and Ors. 2001 A.C.J. 311; Chandan v. Kanwarlal 1989 A.C.J. 816; Khairullah v. Anita ; Nankuram Sarajdin v. Member, M.A.C.T., Thane 1994 (2) T.A.C. 346, and Halki Bai v. New India Insurance Co. Ltd. . The learned Judges in these cases have consistently held that remarriage of a widow would not disentitle her to claim compensation.
Jammu & Kashmir High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Seema Malik And Ors. vs Union Of India (Uoi) on 27 November, 2002

Some other decisions dealing with this aspect of the matter are Rajinder Kumar and Ors. v. Soma Devi and Ors., 2001 ACJ 311; Chandan v. Kanwarlal, 1989 ACJ 816; Khairullah v. Anita 1994 ACJ 1017; Nankuram Sarajdin v. Member MACT, Thane, 1994 (2) TAC 346 and Halki Bai v. New India Insurance Co. Ltd. 1999 ACJ 187. The learned Judges in these cases have consistently held that remarriage of a widow would not dis-entitle her to claim compensation.
Jammu & Kashmir High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 4 - Full Document

The National Insurance Company Ltd vs Sheeba P.R

4. Per contra, Sri.Shaji submitted that Ext.A10 certificate will show that the deceased was due for a promotion immediately. He also submitted that, at any rate, the multiplicand should have been fixed taking into account the sure prospects of the deceased in his career. The multiplicand of Rs.6,000/- adopted by the learned Tribunal is too low. He also submitted that the compensation awarded by the learned Tribunal under other heads is also inadequate. Sri.Shaji placed reliance on the judgment of Rajasthan High Court in Kalli and others v. Indra Raj Baira and others (2006 ACJ 887) and also on the judgment of the Himachal Pradesh High Court in Rajinder Kumar & Others v. Soma Devi and Others (2001 ACJ 307) to advance the preposition that even in a case where the widow remarries, she should be awarded compensation on the basis that at the time of the accident, she was the wife of the deceased.
Kerala High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - A V Pillai - Full Document
1