Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 123 (2.21 seconds)
Documents citing Gian Chand vs Gopala & Ors on 18 January, 1995

Ajit Singh vs Union Of India Thru' Secy. & 6 Others on 6 July, 2017

In Ajay Krishan Singhal v. Union of India10, Mahavir v. Rural Institute11, Gian Chand v. Gopala12 and Meera Sahni v. Lt. Governor of Delhi13 this Court categorically held that, a person who purchases land after the publication of a Section 4 notification with respect to it, is not entitled to challenge the proceedings for the reason, that his title is void and he can at best claim compensation on the basis of vendor's title. In view of this, the sale of land after issuance of a Section 4 notification is void and the purchaser cannot challenge the acquisition proceedings.
Allahabad High Court Cites 97 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

M/S.Macro Marvel Projects Limited vs M.Arumugam

There is no dispute or disagreement that Gian Chand case is under the Central Act, unlike the instant case which is under the Tamil Nadu Acquisition Act. Therefore, I have no hesitation in coming to a conclusion that the impugned arbitral award has not misread the relevant acquisition Act, under which land acquisition proceedings were initiated in the instant case.
Madras High Court Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - M Sundar - Full Document

Devi Prasad Chaudhary vs U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad And Others on 26 February, 2020

In Ajay Kishan Singhal v. Union of India: AIR 1996 SC 2677; Mahavir and Anr. v. Rural Institute, Amravati and Anr. : (1995) 5 SCC 335; Gian Chand v. Gopala and Ors. : (1995) 2 SCC 528; and Meera Sahni v. Lieutenant Governor of Delhi and Ors. : (2008) 9 SCC 177, this Court categorically held that a person who purchases land after the publication of a Section 4 notification with respect to it, is not entitled to challenge the proceedings for the reason, that his title is void and he can at best claim compensation on the basis of vendor's title. In view of this, the sale of land after issuance of a Section 4 notification is void, and the purchaser cannot challenge the acquisition proceedings.
Allahabad High Court Cites 44 - Cited by 2 - Full Document

Vasanthi Hegde Through Her Poa G. V. ... vs The State Of Maharashtra Through The ... on 28 March, 2025

In Ajay Kishan Singhal v. Union of India 19 ; Mahavir v. Rural Institute20, Gian Chand v. Gopala21 and Meera Sahni v. State (NCT of Delhi)22, this Court categorically held that a person who purchases land after the publication of a Section 4 Notification with respect to it, is not entitled to challenge the proceedings for the reason, that his title is void and he can at best claim compensation on the basis of vendor's title. In view of this, the sale of land after issuance of a Section 4 Notification is void, and the purchaser cannot challenge the acquisition proceedings.
Bombay High Court Cites 36 - Cited by 0 - M S Sonak - Full Document

Vasanthi Hegde Through Her Poa G.V. ... vs The State Of Maharashtra Through The ... on 28 March, 2025

In Ajay Kishan Singhal v. Union of India 19 ; Mahavir v. Rural Institute20, Gian Chand v. Gopala21 and Meera Sahni v. State (NCT of Delhi)22, this Court categorically held that a person who purchases land after the publication of a Section 4 Notification with respect to it, is not entitled to challenge the proceedings for the reason, that his title is void and he can at best claim compensation on the basis of vendor's title. In view of this, the sale of land after issuance of a Section 4 Notification is void, and the purchaser cannot challenge the acquisition proceedings.
Bombay High Court Cites 36 - Cited by 0 - M S Sonak - Full Document

Vasanthi Hegde Through Her Poa G. V. ... vs The State Of Maharashtra Through The ... on 28 March, 2025

In Ajay Kishan Singhal v. Union of India 19 ; Mahavir v. Rural Institute20, Gian Chand v. Gopala21 and Meera Sahni v. State (NCT of Delhi)22, this Court categorically held that a person who purchases land after the publication of a Section 4 Notification with respect to it, is not entitled to challenge the proceedings for the reason, that his title is void and he can at best claim compensation on the basis of vendor's title. In view of this, the sale of land after issuance of a Section 4 Notification is void, and the purchaser cannot challenge the acquisition proceedings.
Bombay High Court Cites 36 - Cited by 0 - M S Sonak - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next