Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.29 seconds)
Documents citing G.Bhagavat Singh vs Bar Council Of Kerala on 18 August, 2009

Vishnu vs State Of Kerala on 25 November, 2019

13. With regard to the remarks of the learned Sessions Judge that "since the reading of the depositions after recording takes much time, I was following this procedure and nobody had Tr.P.(Crl) No.100/2019 10 raised any complaint against this", it is only necessary to extract a passage from the decision of this Court in Bhagavat Singh v. State of Kerala : 2008 (4) KHC 717 : 2008 (4) KLT 1047, which reads as follows:
Kerala High Court Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Jaison K.Sani vs Rasna on 3 October, 2016

12. That was a case where the witness after signing the deposition, pointed out certain defects and wanted to correct the same and that was declined by the Court and that was upheld by this Court. This Court has considered the same question and gave direction regarding the procedure to be followed where correction pointed out by the witness in the deposition recorded, in the decision reported in Muhammed Kunhi V. Muhammed Haji (2014 (3) KLT 1027) and this Court also relied on the decision O.P.(FC).No.5 of 2017 10 reported in Bhagavat Singh's case (supra) and also the decision reported in Mirmohammad Omar v. State of West Bengal (AIR 1989 SC 1785) where it has been held that the object of Section 278 of the Code of Civil Procedure is not intended to permit the witness to resile from the statement in the name of correction as follows:
Kerala High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - K Ramakrishnan - Full Document
1