K.Palanisamy vs The Sub Registrar on 28 July, 2016
3.Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the matter in issue is squarely covered by the order dated 10.02.2016 made in W.P. Nos.38363 and 38887 of 2015 (P.Ramiah and others vs. The Inspector General of Registration, Chennai and others). Learned counsel for the petitioner has drawn the attention of this Court to Section 19-B(4) of the Indian Stamp Act 1899 and as per the said proviso, action is to be taken within a period of four years from the date of receipt of the copy of such instrument in the State of Tamil Nadu under the Registration Act, 1908 and admittedly even as per the letter of the Sub Registrar, Vadakkencherry, Palakkad District addressed to the District Registrar, Namakkal, the fact of the said registration, was brought to the knowledge of the said District Registrar, Namakkal as early as on 06.09.2006 and further that the very same property was also subjected to earlier mortgage in document No.2057/2014 dated 17.03.2014. He would further submit that in the light of the same, there cannot be any impediment or difficulty on the part of the respondent to register and return the document and prays for appropriate order to direct the respondent to register the mortgage deed.