Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.39 seconds)
Documents citing Prakash Narayan Tiwari vs The State Of Chhattisgarh & Ors on 7 July, 2015

Om Prakash Sharma vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 2 December, 2025

7. It is further evident from perusal of the return filed by the State that a fresh advertisement on 23.06.2025 was issued. Written test as well as interview have already been conducted, and the merit list is under process or preparation. Therefore, in such circumstances, no interference with the impugned orders is warranted. The decisions which are being relied upon by the petitioner are of no assistance to him inasmuch as the decision of Division Bench of this Court in the case of Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangthan and others v. Dr. R.K. Shashtri and another reported in 2005 (4) MPHT 352 Signature Not Verified Signed by: VARSHA CHOURASIYA Signing time: 04-12-2025 14:34:26 NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2025:MPHC-JBP:62537 5 WP-39111-2025 as well as decision of High Court of Chhattisgarh passed in WPS No.217/2015 in the case of Prakash Narayan Tiwari v. State of Chhattisgarh and others pertain to cases of suspension.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - A K Singh - Full Document

Nand Kishore Tiwari vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 21 August, 2015

4. Be that as it may, in view of the law laid down by this Court in the matter of Prakash Narayan Tiwari (supra), the writ petition is disposed of with a direction that in the event the petitioner prefers a representation before respondent No.3 Collector, Surajpur raising his grievance on the issue within a period of 15 days from today, the said respondent shall consider and decide the same keeping in view the law laid down by this Court in the matter of Prakash Narayan Tiwari (supra) and take appropriate decision in the matter within a further period of 8 weeks from the date of submission of representation.
Chattisgarh High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - P K Mishra - Full Document

A. K. Patre vs Union Of India on 21 November, 2017

4. Considering the issue brought before this Court and for the fact that the matter in issue is squarely covered by the judgment rendered by this Court in Prakash Narayan Tiwari (supra), the writ petition is disposed of with a direction that the respondents shall not give effect to the impugned order and allow the petitioner to work on the post, where he was working on the date when he was suspended, however, the respondents would be at liberty to pass fresh order, if the administrative exigency so requires, in respect of petitioner's posting.
Chattisgarh High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - P K Mishra - Full Document
1