Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 9 of 9 (0.47 seconds)
Documents citing State Of Punjab And Others vs Harpreet Singh Son Of Taranjit Singh ... on 20 July, 2010

State vs . : Harpreet Singh on 7 September, 2011

Constable Parveen Singh was examined as PW-8 who proved the proceeding carried out during investigation on the spot when he FIR No. 593/04 State Vs Harpreet Singh 4 of 6 went there alongwith IO SI Dhruv Narain. He was duly cross examined wherein he stated that he does not remember departure entry and time by which they proceeded from PS to area but stated that he received information at 1.30 pm reached the spot at 1:40 pm, reached the spot 2:30 pm and at 4:00 pm he went to PS for registration of FIR. Constable Jai Parkash was examined as PW-9 who proved the entry no. 593/04 in register no. 19 regarding depositing of case property by the then MHC(M). HC Ganesh was examined as PW-10 who stated that he cannot produced the WagnaR car and fake number plates as the same was deposited in PS Prashant Vihar and released to Constable Satbir Singh vide RC no. 162/21/05 qua case FIR bearing no. 998/04 under Section 394/397/34 IPC. Dr. Kuldeep Singh, was examined as PW-11 who proved MLC No. 6406/04 as Ex.PW-11/B and note on same as Ex. PW-11/A. Dr. B. N. Acharya was examined as PW-12 who proved the postmortem as Ex.PW-12/A. These witnesses were not cross examined despite opportunity. No other PW was examined.
Delhi District Court Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs . Harpreet Singh on 24 February, 2011

In my considered opinion, speed in itself is a very subjective term and simply because the scooter was being driven at a high speed that in itself is not a conclusive proof of indictable rashness or negligence. The time of the accident was reportedly FIR No.457/02 5 State vs. Harpreet Singh 10:00 p.m in the night. The prosecution has failed to throw any light regarding conditions at the spot of the accident at the pertinent point of time. Even the Site plan remains unproved. The complainant/ injured Vijay Singh could not be examined on behalf of the prosecution as he was reportedly untraceable. In these circumstances, I am of the opinion that it would not be safe to convict the accused upon the sole allegation of driving the scooter at a fast speed.
Delhi District Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Harpreet Singh vs State Of Punjab on 21 April, 2022

1. On 29.3.2022, as unfolded by an order made by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Ludhiana, case titled State versus Harpreet Singh, bearing CIS No. NDPS/226/2020, became listed for adduction of prosecution evidence. On date (supra), for want of the petitioner herein, recording his personal appearance, before the learned trial Judge concerned, and, despite the lis being repeatedly called, led the learned trial Judge concerned, to make an order for cancellation, and, forfeiture of the personal, and, surety bonds, to the State, and, also led the learned trial Judge concerned, to issue non-bailable warrants against the accused concerned, and, made them returnable for 14.4.2022.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - S Thakur - Full Document

Harjit Singh vs State Of Punjab on 24 August, 2022

This is a petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. for quashing of order dated 27.07.2022 passed by the Special Judge, Fazilka in case titled as State of Punjab Vs. Harpreet Singh and etc., vide which, non- bailable warrants have been issued against the petitioner in FIR No.188 dated 17.12.2021 registered under Sections 15/61/85 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, at Police Station Vairoke, District Fazilka.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - V Bahl - Full Document

Taranjeet Singh @ Taranjit Singh vs State Of Punjab And Others on 12 February, 2024

The Prayer in this petition is for quashing of FIR No.23 dated 14.03.2016 (Annexure P-1) under Sections 279, 337, 338 IPC registered at Police Station Mulepur, District Fatehgarh Sahib and all consequential proceedings as well as Judgment and Conviction Order dated 09.10.2019 (Annexure P-2) passed by ld. JMIC Fatehgarh Sahib in case no.CHI-2 of 2017 titled as State Vs. Taranjit Singh on the basis of compromise dated 07.10.2023 (Annexure P-4) arrived at between the parties.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - J S Bedi - Full Document
1