Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.27 seconds)
Documents citing Rajmal Lakhichand Jewellers Pvt. ... vs Deputy Commissioner Of Income-Tax,, ... on 7 March, 2018

Deputy Commissioner Of Income-Tax,, vs M/S. R.L. Jewells Pvt. Ltd.,, Jalgaon on 8 August, 2018

7. It is an admitted fact that there is no change in the facts and the nature of transactions are identical. We further observe that similar disallowances were made in the case of other sister concerns of the assessee viz. Rajmal Lakhichand Jewellers Pvt. Ltd. and R.L. Gold Pvt. Ltd. The matter travelled up to the Tribunal and the Tribunal in the cases of Rajmal Lakhichand Jewellers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Jt. Commissioner of Income Tax (supra) and R.L. Gold Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax (supra) has deleted the disallowances u/s. 40A(2) of the Act.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Pune Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Deputy Commissioner Of Income-Tax,, vs M/S. R.L. Gold Pvt. Ltd.,, Jalgaon on 31 August, 2018

"7. It is an admitted fact that there is no change in the facts and the nature of transactions are identical. We further observe that similar disallowances were made in the case of other sister concerns of the assessee viz. Rajmal Lakhichand Jewellers Pvt. Ltd. and R.L. Gold Pvt. Ltd. The matter travelled up to the Tribunal and the Tribunal in the cases of Rajmal Lakhichand Jewellers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Jt. Commissioner of Income Tax (supra) and R.L. Gold Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax (supra) has deleted the disallowances u/s. 40A(2) of the Act.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Pune Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

M/S. Rajmal Lakhichand And Sons,, vs Joint Commissioner Of Income-Tax,, on 31 August, 2018

"7. It is an admitted fact that there is no change in the facts and the nature of transactions are identical. We further observe that similar disallowances were made in the case of other sister concerns of the assessee viz. Rajmal Lakhichand Jewellers Pvt. Ltd. and R.L. Gold Pvt. Ltd. The matter travelled up to the Tribunal and the Tribunal in the cases of Rajmal Lakhichand Jewellers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Jt. Commissioner of Income Tax (supra) and R.L. Gold Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax (supra) has deleted the disallowances u/s. 40A(2) of the Act.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Pune Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1