Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.24 seconds)

Sukhdev vs State Of Maharashtra on 27 March, 2002

20. Mrs. Dangre, learned A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State relied upon the judgment of Punjab and Haryana High Court in the case of Vishwa Nath v. State of Haryana (supra), and submitted that the Punjab and Haryana High Court has held in the said case that since the accused had not satisfactorily explained certain facts which were within his own knowledge and had, in fact, disbelieved whatever explanation which was given by the accused and had dismissed the appeal.
Bombay High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - V M Kanade - Full Document

Sukhdev Bhimrao Hastapure vs State Of Maharashtra on 27 March, 2002

20. Mrs. Dangre, learned A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State relied upon the Judgment of Punjab and Haryana High Court in the case of Vishwa Nath v. State of Haryana reported in 1999 Cri.L.J. 3896, and submitted that the Punjab and Haryana High Court has held the in said case that since the accused had not satisfactorily explained certain facts which were within his own knowledge and had, in fact, disbelieved whatever explanation which was given by the accused and had dismissed the appeal.
Bombay High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 1 - V M Kanade - Full Document
1