Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 11 (0.92 seconds)
Documents citing The Director General Of Police (W.B.) ... vs Gopal Kumar Agarwal &Anr on 15 April, 2020

Chandrima Roy vs The State Of West Bengal And Ors on 20 July, 2020

Lastly reliance is also placed in case of Director General of Police (West Bengal) & Ors. Vs. Gopal Kumar Agarwal & Anr. in 2020 SCC Online Cal 755 at paragraph 70 to submit that bald allegation of biasness against the investigating agency should not 20 be taken into consideration for the purpose of transfer of the investigation to a special investigating agency. It has been observed that:
Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side) Cites 11 - Cited by 1 - S Prasad - Full Document

S.Sunil vs Senthamarai on 26 November, 2025

a. K.S.Duraisami Nadar vs. Sivanupapandia Nadar, (1944) 57 lw 168 (Mad) (DB) b. S.A.L.Narayan Row & anr.V.Ishwarlal Bhagwandas & anr, (1965) SCC OnLine SC 18 c. K.Rajamanickam vs. State of Tamil Nadu, 1991 SCC OnLine Mad 897 Page 6 of 22 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 27/11/2025 06:07:18 pm ) LPA.Nos.41 & 42 of 2025 d.State of Punjab v. Davinder Pal Singh Bhullar and others reported in (2011) 14 SCC 770 e. Ram Kishan Fauji vs. State of Haryana and others (2017) 5 SCC 533 f. C.Muhu vs. K.Thamizh Selvi & anr., 2017 SCC OnLine Mad 37072 g.G.Prabhakaran vs. Superintendent of Police and anr, 2018 SCC OnLine Mad 14003 h.Director General of Police & others v. Gopal Kumar Agarwal and another, 2020 SCC OnLine Cal 755 i. Jasbir Singh and others v. State of Punjab & ors., reported in (2022) 13 SCC 462
Madras High Court Cites 36 - Cited by 0 - N S Kumar - Full Document

Srabanti Sinha Roy And Another vs State Of West Bengal And Others on 29 November, 2024

The Division Bench further distinguished the earlier Coordinate Bench decision rendered in Gopal Kumar Agarwal and Another (supra) on a factual matrix and held that the ratio of law laid down therein was founded upon the grant of relief of transfer of investigation and such relief being alternative was not under the consideration by the Single Bench in the impugned order, therefore, it does not have any bearing on the said case.
Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side) Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - H Tandon - Full Document

Kushal Agarwal vs Mahendra Kumar Jain & Ors on 13 July, 2022

So far as the judgment in the matter of Suprana Kanjilal Chakraborty vs. Suvendu Adhikari and Ors. dated 17.11.2021 passed in MAT 993 of 2021 relied upon by the learned Counsel for the respondent No. 1 is concerned, by this judgment the earlier judgment in the case of Gopal Kumar Agarwal 3 and Another (supra) has been taken note of and it has been held that the said judgment rests on the point of grant of the relief of transfer of investigation and such relief being alternative and not under consideration by the order impugned in the appeal, hence not apropo the factual scenario of the case.
Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side) Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - P Shrivastava - Full Document

Sanstosh Kumari vs State Of Punjab And Ors on 19 January, 2023

and others vs. Gopal Kumar Agarwal and another, 2020 (3) Cal. L.T. 158 to submit that both the above said judgments were distinguished as such by the Division Bench of the Calcutta High Court which has proceeded as such to hold that the appeals were maintainable on the ground that no point of criminal law was decided by the learned Single Judge. Thus, we are of the view that in view of the said co-ordinate Bench judgments, there is no need to take a divergent view.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - G S Sandhawalia - Full Document
1   2 Next