Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 15 (0.76 seconds)
Documents citing Gurdev Singh And Anr. vs State Of Bihar And Anr. on 13 March, 2000

Dasaripalli Sudheer Sudheer Babu vs State Of Andhra Pradesh on 8 February, 2024

"6.xxx. As a general proposition, the plea raised by the appellant is correct. It is equally true that the accused who is on bail, should be heard before an order of cancellation of bail is passed by the Court. This Court in Gurdev Singh v. State of Bihar held that the accused must be given notice and opportunity of hearing before the bail granted to him is cancelled."
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Palanivel vs The State on 29 March, 2019

The plea of the appellant's learned Counsel is that if the Sessions Court had granted bail, the order of cancellation of such bail should also have been passed by the Sessions Court or by any superior Court and not by the learned Magistrate who is not empowered to cancel it. As a general proposition, the plea raised http://www.judis.nic.in by the appellant is correct. It is equally true that the accused who 76 is on bail, should be heard before an order of cancellation of bail is passed by the Court. This Court in Gurdev Singh & Anr. vs. State of Bihar & Anr. 2000(4) Crimes 103 = AIR 2000 SC 3556 held that the accused must be given notice and opportunity of hearing before the bail granted to him is cancelled.
Madras High Court Cites 50 - Cited by 2 - N A Venkatesh - Full Document

Hakan Zanburkan And Ors vs The State Of Tripura (To Be Represented ... on 25 June, 2021

"6.The plea of the appellant's learned Counsel is that if the Sessions Court had granted bail, the order of cancellation of such bail should also have been passed by the Sessions Court or by any superior Court and not by the learned Magistrate who is not empowered to cancel it. As a general proposition, the plea raised by the appellant is correct. It is equally true that the accused who is on bail, should be heard before an order of cancellation of bail is passed by the Court. This Court in Gurdev Singh v. State of Bihar held that the accused must be given notice and opportunity of hearing before the bail granted to him is cancelled."
Tripura High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - S G Chattopadhyay - Full Document

P.K. Shaji @ Thammanam Shaji vs State Of Kerala on 27 October, 2005

The plea of the appellant's learned Counsel is that if the Sessions Court had granted bail, the order of cancellation of such bail should also have been passed by the Sessions Court or by any superior Court and not by the learned Magistrate who is not empowered to cancel it. As a general proposition, the plea raised by the appellant is correct. It is equally true that the accused who is on bail, should be heard before an order of cancellation of bail is passed by the Court. This Court in Gurdev Singh & Anr. vs. State of Bihar & Anr. 2000(4) Crimes 103 = AIR 2000 SC 3556 held that the accused must be given notice and opportunity of hearing before the bail granted to him is cancelled.
Supreme Court of India Cites 9 - Cited by 3829 - K G Balakrishnan - Full Document

Ashok vs Shri Nirmal Kumar Mandloi on 3 September, 2024

6. The next submission of the applicant that his submissions and pleadings and citation of judgments pleaded in the petition have not been not considered. He referred the judgments passed in the case of Gurdev Singh and Anr. Vs. State of Bihar reported in (2005) 13 SCC 286 wherein it has been held that the cancellation of bail cannot be done without giving notice to the accused and without giving him opportunity of being heard and also judgment of P.K Shaji @ Thammanam Shaji vs. State of Kerala reported in (2005) 13 SCC 283 where the Apex Court held that the accused must be heard before his bail is cancelled. He argues that this Court ought to have gone through the entire pleadings and to mention the judgments quoted in the petition.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - V K Shukla - Full Document

Amarjeet Singh vs State Of Nct Of Delhi & Anr on 6 May, 2026

"6. The plea of the appellant's learned counsel is that if the Sessions Court had granted bail, the order of cancellation of such bail should also have been passed by the Sessions Court or by any superior court and not by the learned Magistrate who is not empowered to cancel it. As a general proposition, the plea raised by the appellant is correct. It is equally true that the accused who is on bail, should be heard before an order of cancellation of bail is passed by the Court. This Court in Gurdev Singh v. State of Bihar [(2005) 13 SCC 286 : AIR 2000 SC 3556 (1) : (2004) 4 Crimes 103] held that the accused must be given notice and opportunity of hearing before the bail granted to him is cancelled."2
Delhi High Court - Orders Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - P Jalan - Full Document

Rajendra Kumar And 2 Others vs State Of U.P. Thru Prin Secy Home And ... on 30 September, 2022

In view of the aforesaid settled legal propositions, this court finds the impugned order which came to be passed by the learned trial court without issuing notice to the applicants and without affording them a reasonable and sufficient opportunity of hearing is patently illegal being in flagrant violation of whatever has been held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Samarendra Nath Bhattacharjee's case (supra), Mehboob Dawood Shaikh's case (supra), Gurdev Singh's case (supra) and in P.K. Shaji alias Thammanam Shaji's case (supra). it has, thus, caused miscarriage of justice to the applicants.
Allahabad High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 Next