citedby: 1976557

Reserved On: 05.09.2025 vs Satnam Singh & Others on 22 September, 2025

(c) Where testimony of witnesses had been disbelieved by the High Court, on an unrealistic conjecture of personal motive on the part of witnesses to implicate the accused, when in fact, the witnesses had no axe to grind in the said matter. [State of Rajasthan v. Sukhpal Singh (1983) 1 SCC 393]

Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 24 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Rajesh Prasad vs The State Of Bihar And Anr. Etc. on 7 January, 2022

c) Where testimony of witnesses had been disbelieved by the High Court, on an unrealistic conjecture of personal motive on the part of witnesses to implicate the accused, when in fact, the witnesses had no axe to grind in the said matter. [State of Rajasthan v. Sukhpal Singh, AIR 1984 SC 207]

Supreme Court of India Cites 36 - Cited by 88 - B V Nagarathna - Full Document

Subramanya vs The State Of Karnataka on 13 October, 2022

(c) Where testimony of witnesses had been disbelieved by the High Court, on an unrealistic conjecture of personal motive on the part of witnesses to implicate the accused, when in fact, the witnesses had no axe to grind in the said matter. [State of Rajasthan v. Sukhpal Singh and Others, (1983) 1 SCC 393].

Supreme Court of India Cites 68 - Cited by 36 - U U Lalit - Full Document

Shri Abdul Haque vs Md.Abdul Kadir on 17 January, 2022

c) Where testimony of witnesses had been disbelieved by the High Court, on an unrealistic conjecture of personal motive on the part of witnesses to implicate the accused, when in fact, the witnesses had no axe to grind in the said matter. [State of Rajasthan v. Sukhpal Singh, (1983) 1 SCC 393 : AIR 1984 SC 207]

Tripura High Court Cites 47 - Cited by 0 - A Lodh - Full Document

State Of Up vs Gaya Singh And 3 Others on 4 August, 2022

c) Where testimony of witnesses had been disbelieved by the High Court, on an unrealistic conjecture of personal motive on the part of witnesses to implicate the accused, when in fact, the witnesses had no axe to grind in the said matter. [State of Rajasthan v. Sukhpal Singh, AIR 1984 SC 207]

Allahabad High Court Cites 55 - Cited by 0 - V K Birla - Full Document

State Of U.P. vs Balram Singh And Anr. on 6 August, 2022

c) Where testimony of witnesses had been disbelieved by the High Court, on an unrealistic conjecture of personal motive on the part of witnesses to implicate the accused, when in fact, the witnesses had no axe to grind in the said matter. [State of Rajasthan v. Sukhpal Singh, AIR 1984 SC 207]

Allahabad High Court Cites 42 - Cited by 0 - V K Birla - Full Document

State Of U.P. vs Sukhai @ Bhagwan Das on 11 August, 2022

c) Where testimony of witnesses had been disbelieved by the High Court, on an unrealistic conjecture of personal motive on the part of witnesses to implicate the accused, when in fact, the witnesses had no axe to grind in the said matter. [State of Rajasthan v. Sukhpal Singh, AIR 1984 SC 207]

Allahabad High Court Cites 50 - Cited by 0 - V K Birla - Full Document

State Of Gujarat vs Madhu Pata on 19 January, 2023

c) Where testimony of witnesses had been disbelieved by the High Court, on an unrealistic conjecture of personal motive on the part of witnesses to implicate the accused, when in fact, the witnesses had no axe to grind in the said matter. [State of Rajasthan v. Sukhpal Singh]

Gujarat High Court Cites 27 - Cited by 0 - V M Pancholi - Full Document

Abhijit Banerjee vs The State Of West Bengal & Ors on 18 September, 2023

c) Where testimony of witnesses had been disbelieved by the High Court, on an unrealistic conjecture of personal motive on the part of witnesses to implicate the accused, when in fact, the witnesses had no axe to grind in the said matter. [State of Rajasthan v. Sukhpal Singh, AIR 1984 SC 207]

Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side) Cites 50 - Cited by 0 - B Chaudhuri - Full Document

Corporation vs Sh. Rakesh Awasthi on 14 May, 2026

(c)Where testimony of witnesses had been disbelieved by the High Court, on an unrealistic conjecture of personal motive on the part of witnesses to implicate the accused, when in fact, rt the witnesses had no axe to grind in the said matter. [State of Rajasthan v. Sukhpal Singh (1983) 1 SCC 393]

Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - S Sharma - Full Document

Search Results Page

Refine Search

Search Results