Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.28 seconds)

G.P.Nursery And Primary School vs V.Seethapathy

18. On the side of the respondent landlord, it is stated that the tenant did not deposit the amount in the first instance and he paid the amount only after the expiry of 26 months and the duty is upon the defendant / tenant to prove that the default is not wilful. A judgment of this Court published in 2000 (II) CTC 577 [K.M.Muneeruddin Vs. P.M.Punnoose] is cited, wherein it is stated that as follows:-
Madras High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - R Tharani - Full Document
1