Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 27 (0.43 seconds)
Documents citing Indrajeet Singh vs State Of U.P. And 4 Others on 22 October, 2021

Abhishek Pratap Singh And 3 Others vs State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. ... on 30 September, 2022

Sri Rathore, learned counsel for the applicants has submitted that the present applicants have already been granted an interim anticipatory bail by this Court vide order dated 29.01.2021 passed in Criminal Misc. Anticipatory Bail Application (U/S 438 Cr.P.C.) No.279 of 2021; Indrajeet Singh vs. State of U.P. and vide order dated 10.03.2021 passed in Criminal Misc. Anticipatory Bail Application (U/S 438 Cr.P.C.)
Allahabad High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - R S Chauhan - Full Document

Ram Pratap Singh vs State Of U.P.And Others on 19 December, 2022

16. However, learned Standing Counsel has tried to support the impugned orders and placed reliance on the judgment of this Court passed in Indrajeet Singh Vs. State of U.P. and others, Writ-C No.4947 of 2019, decided on 22.10.2021 wherein relying upon the judgment given in the case of Deputy Inspector General of Police and another Vs. S. Samuthiram, (2013) 1 SCC 598, it has been held that "the expressions 'honorable acquittal', 'acquitted of blame', 'fully exonerated' are unknown to the Code of Criminal Procedure or the Penal Code, which are coined by judicial pronouncements. It is difficult to define precisely what is meant by the expression 'honorably acquitted'. When the accused is acquitted after full consideration of prosecution evidence and that the prosecution had miserably failed to prove the charges levelled against the accused, it can possibly be said that the accused was honorably acquitted".
Allahabad High Court Cites 27 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Rakesh Kumar Sharma vs State Of U P And 2 Others on 17 February, 2023

18. This Court has not taken absolutely contrary view, rather clarified the position that it is not a thumb rule that on basis of a merely criminal case, arms license can never be revoked, nor in absence of misuse of arms license, arms license cannot be revoked for security of public peace and public safety in respect of an individual person, therefore, this Court is not bound to refer the matter to a larger Bench and further clarified by way of an hypothetical example that if a person having an arms license enters into house of a neighbour and assaults him with 'Lathi' and during investigation an offence was found to be prima-facie proved at the stage of framing of charge i.e. the case is found to be more than prima-facie, where it would itself be a reason to revoke the arms license. This Court is of the view that though petitioner has disturbed peace and safety of an individual, however, there is more than likelihood that he can repeat such incident, therefore the importance of word 'security' came into consideration that such person may not repeat such incident and the Legislature has carefully choosen the word 'for the security of public peace and public safety', it has not used the word 'public order'. For the purpose of public peace and public safety, an individual cannot be held guilty this has been discussed by this Court in Indrajeet Singh (supra).
Allahabad High Court Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - S S Shamshery - Full Document

Utpal Rai vs State Of U.P. And 4 Others on 5 December, 2023

12. This Court in Writ-C No. 4947 of 2019 (Indrajeet Singh v. State of U.P. and four others), decided on 22.10.2021, held that while considering the criminal history, the nature of acquittal in cases should be given importance. It has been further observed by the Court that the subjective satisfaction of the Licensing Authority cannot be judged without there being any specific ground of any malice being levied. The relevant paragraphs of the said judgment are hereby quoted as under:
Allahabad High Court Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - P Agrawal - Full Document

Ranvijay Singh vs State Of U.P. Thru Secy. Home And Others on 12 September, 2024

6. On the other hand, Mr. Prabhakar Tripathi, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents, submitted that the firearm license of the petitioner was rightly cancelled on the ground of pendency of criminal case under Section 302 IPC. He further submitted that mere acquittal in the aforementioned criminal case will not amount to restore the firearm licence of the petitioner. He further submitted that no interference is required against the impugned orders and the writ petition is liable to be dismissed. He placed reliance upon the judgement of this Court reported in 2021 0 Supreme (All) 840 Indrajeet Singh Vs. State of U.P. & 4 Ors in support of his arguement.
Allahabad High Court Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 Next