citedby: 1979065

1 - 2 of 2 (0.29 seconds)

Documents citing Ajitkumar C. Kamdar vs Dy Cit on 26 February, 2004

Ito,Wd-12(3), Kolkata, Kolkata vs M/S Arpee Builders & Promoters Pvt. ... on 5 February, 2018

In other words, it is not obligatory for assessee to place demonstrative proof for establishing a debt as bad - Ajitkumar C. Kamdar v. CIT [2005] 1 SOT 183(Mum.).

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Kolkata Cites 10 - Cited by 2 - Full Document

Satishchand Samirmal Gothi Huf, Itarsi vs Assessee on 9 April, 2013

reliance on the decision of Hon'ble High Court Madhya Pradesh in the case of Balkishan Ajitkumar vs. CIT 263 ITR 610. It may be noted that in the case of M/s Balkishan Ajitkumar, the Hon'ble court has observed that the total sale cannot be profit and that the sales comprises the cost of purchases, other expenses and the profit involved in such sales.

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Indore Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Search Results Page

Refine Search

Search Results

Ito,Wd-12(3), Kolkata, Kolkata vs M/S Arpee Builders & Promoters Pvt. ... on 5 February, 2018

Satishchand Samirmal Gothi Huf, Itarsi vs Assessee on 9 April, 2013