Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.46 seconds)

Rikhab Raj Kumbhat vs State Of Rajasthan & Orthers on 3 January, 2001

(19). The Madras High Court, on number of occasions, had directed the Government to apply its mind and consider the matter in the hope that the Government after such consideration would recognise the just claims of the petitioners and act in accordance with the recommendations that had been made by the Chief Justice of the said Court. The Government in fact accepted the recommendations of the Chief Justice and fixed the pay and other emoluments of 132 Asstt. Section Officers in the High Court service on par with the Asstt. Section Officers of the Secretariat Service. This judgment is reported in 1993 (2) L.W. 159 (5). The writ-appeal filed against the said judgment was also dismissed by the Division Bench by issuing a direction that the Government is bound to give effect to the recommendations of the Chief Justice.
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

P.Anburajan vs The State Of Tamilnadu on 2 September, 2021

4.It is submitted that a similar order was also passed in W.P.Nos.25271 to 25278 of 2014 vide order dated 17.09.2014 in the case of K.Murugan and others Vs. Government of Tamil Nadu and others the learned counsel has today also placed reliance on a recent order dated 27.07.2021 of this Court in W.P.No.15474 of 2021 in M.Saraswathi and others Vs. The State of Tamil Nadu and another wherein, under similar circumstances, noting the decision of the Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court and that of the Hon'ble Supreme court, the respondents were directed to appoint the petitioners therein as Forest Watchers by relaxing the Rules if necessary as was done in the case of one Sivanesan vide https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ 4/7 W.P.No.18373 of 2021 G.O.(2D) No.56, Environment and Forest Department, dated 06.09.2006.
Madras High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - C Saravanan - Full Document
1