Om Prakash vs Sm. Tahera Begam And Ors. on 22 December, 1954
5. We are, therefore, of opinion that it cannot be held that the provisions of Order 21, Rule 11 (2), Clause (f), Civil P. C. bar simultaneous execution applications. The case law on the point fully supports the view that several execution applications can be in progress at one & the same time. We may refer to the esses reported in -- 'Sarasti Prasad v. People's Industrial Bank Ltd.', AIR 1917 All 129 (A); -- 'Makkhan Lal v. Mt. Bhagwanai Kuer', AIR 1936 All 655 (B), and -- 'Morarjee Gokuldas and Co. v. Shoiapur Spinning and Weaving Co Ltd.', AIR 1941 Bom 37 CO. (8) We therefore, dismiss this appeal summarily.