Municipal Corporation Of Delhi vs Jagbir Singh Sharma And Anr. on 17 January, 2012
12. Learned counsel for Respondent No.1, on the other hand, pointed out
O.M.P. No. 399 of 2006 Page 7 of 10
that findings of the learned Arbitrator were purely factual. This Court was
not expected to re-appreciate the evidence. The finding was further that
roads 19 to 21 were part of roads 1 to 18. As regards the delay in
Respondent No.1 starting the work, it is submitted that extensions were
granted by the MCD itself as it was realized that the materials in the form of
concrete, cement, etc. were not issued in time to Respondent No.1 by the
MCD. It was further submitted that between the same parties, with regard
to another set of roads, the award was upheld by this Court by order dated
17th September, 2007 in OMP No.160 of 2007 titled as MCD v. Jagbir
Singh Sharma.