Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 107 (1.02 seconds)
Documents citing Ge Capital Transportation Financial ... vs Rahisuddin Khan on 9 September, 2011

K.K. Chopra vs . Praveen Kumar Sharma on 12 April, 2012

After going through the complaint and the affidavit of the complainant's witness and after considering the issues of limitation and jurisdiction (GE Capital Transportation Services Ltd. Vs. Rahisuddin Khan dated 09.09.2011 passed by Hon'ble High Court of Delhi), I am of the opinion that prima facie a case for offence punishable under section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 is made out against the accused person.
Delhi District Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

M/S D.R.K. Engineers (P) Ltd. vs . V. Singh & Ors. on 28 April, 2012

After going through the complaint and the affidavit of the complainant's witness and after considering the issues of limitation and jurisdiction (GE Capital Transportation Services Ltd. Vs. Rahisuddin Khan dated 09.09.2011 passed by Hon'ble High Court of Delhi), I am of the opinion that prima facie a case for offence punishable under section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 is made out against the accused person.
Delhi District Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

M/S Green Express vs . Kuleshwar on 7 June, 2012

Complainant has filed his affidavit alongwith documents exhibited by the Oath Commissioner. Affidavit taken on record as evidence is marked for identification as Mark-R. After going through the complaint and the affidavit of the complainant's witness and after considering the issues of limitation, jurisdiction (GE Capital Transportation Financial Services Ltd. Vs Rahisuddin Khan decided on 09.09.2011) and cause of action, I am of the opinion that prima facie a case for offence punishable under section 138 NI Act, 1881 is made out against the accused.
Delhi District Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sanjive Kumar Gulati vs . Mukesh Bhatia on 11 April, 2012

After going through the complaint and the affidavit of the complainant's witness and after considering the issues of limitation and jurisdiction (GE Capital Transportation Services Ltd. Vs. Rahisuddin Khan dated 09.09.2011 passed by Hon'ble High Court of Delhi), I am of the opinion that prima facie a case for offence punishable under section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 is made out against the accused person.
Delhi District Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

United Cooperative (U) T & C Society Ltd. vs . Jagbir Singh Chaudhary on 26 April, 2012

After going through the complaint and the affidavit of the complainant's witness and after considering the issues of limitation and jurisdiction (GE Capital Transportation Services Ltd. Vs. Rahisuddin Khan dated 09.09.2011 passed by Hon'ble High Court of Delhi), I am of the opinion that prima facie a case for offence punishable under section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 is made out against the accused person.
Delhi District Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Shri Kamal Jain vs Subodh Kumar Gupta on 13 January, 2012

In view of principles of law laid down in case GE Capital Transportation Financial Services Ltd. v. Rahisuddin Khan, (supra), the principles of law laid down in case of Harman Electronics (P) Ltd. & Anr. v. National Panasonic India Ltd., (supra), Hema Chaturvedi v. M/s Sunint Enterprises Pvt. Ltd., (supra), relied on by counsel for appellant will not provide any benefit to the appellant.
Delhi District Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

M/S Capital Books Pvt. Ltd. vs . Theodore Branganza on 25 April, 2012

After going through the complaint and the affidavit of the complainant's witness and after considering the issues of limitation and jurisdiction (GE Capital Transportation Services Ltd. Vs. Rahisuddin Khan dated 09.09.2011 passed by Hon'ble High Court of Delhi), I am of the opinion that prima facie a case for offence punishable under section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 is made out against the accused person.
Delhi District Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Ajay Jain vs . Faquir Chand on 5 July, 2012

After going through the complaint and the affidavit of the complainant's witness and after considering the issues of limitation and jurisdiction (GE Capital Transportation Services Ltd. Vs. Rahisuddin Khan dated 09.09.2011 passed by Hon'ble High Court of Delhi), I am of the opinion that prima facie a case for offence punishable under section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 is made out against the accused person.
Delhi District Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next