Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 23 (0.50 seconds)
Documents citing Pooran Singh And Others vs State Of U.P. And Another on 18 January, 2019

Mahesh And Others vs State Of U.P. And Others on 22 April, 2020

66. It is not disputed before us that Rule 4 of Rules, 1963 is mandatory and its compliance is also mandatory. Learned counsel for petitioners further contended that fact of this case are similar as were involved in Division Bench judgment of this Court in Pooran and others vs State of U.P. (supra). But, we find that there is a distinction between said judgment and facts of present case. The proposition of law with respect to applicability of Part VII is clear as we have already discussed in detail but 'when it will be applicable' and "whether facts of present case would attract the same or not", is the moot question.
Allahabad High Court Cites 67 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sharad Agrawal vs State Of U.P. And Another on 25 September, 2019

It may also be useful to extract the relevant observations made by the coordinate Bench of this Court in the case of Pooran Singh and others versus State of U.P. and another, Case:-Application U/S 482 No. 12993 of 2004 whereby the issues about the maintainability of parallel proceedings, their feasibility and permissibility were gone into by His Lordship. The relevant pronouncements of the Apex Court were relied upon and detailed references to them were also made and it was concluded that the proceeding in a civil case and the proceeding of the criminal case can well go on together. The relevant portions of the aforesaid judgments may be reproduced herein-below.
Allahabad High Court Cites 16 - Cited by 1 - K N Bajpayee - Full Document

Pooran Singh And 4 Others vs State Of U.P. And Another on 3 November, 2022

This petitioner has been filed for quashing of the order dated 8.9.2022 passed by Sessions Judge, Firozabad in Criminal Revision No. 90 of 2022 (Pooran Singh and others Vs. State) and order dated 24.5..2022 passed by A.C.J.M. Shikohabad Firozabad in Criminal Case No. 2968 of 2018 arising out of Case Crime No. 511 of 2017, under sections 420, 467, 468, 471 IPC, P.S. Jasrana, District Firozabad.
Allahabad High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - G Chowdhary - Full Document

Deependra Kumar Srivastava vs State Of U.P. And 4 Others on 28 February, 2023

Reliance has also been placed on the judgment dated 5.7.2016 in Writ C No.29995 of 2016 (Pooran Singh & Ors. v. State of U.P. & Ors.), wherein the Court has opined that the construction of transmission power service lines cannot be stopped for want of payment of compensation. However, an appropriate direction can be issued to the competent authority for determining the compensation in accordance with law and pay the same to the tenure holders over whose land the towers are being erected. The competent authority for disbursement of compensation is the District Magistrate. It is contended that high voltage line alignment cannot be changed. However, on the instructions, he submits that the matter is ceased before the authority concerned and in case if it is feasible for minor shift of high voltage wire, then exact location of the holding is to be apprised by the petitioner to the authority concerned so that remedial measures may be taken in the matter.
Allahabad High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Kailash Nath Yadav vs State Of U.P. And 2 Others on 23 March, 2023

This Court, in Writ C No.29995 of 2016 (Pooran Singh and 30 others vs. State of UP and 3 ors) decided on 5.7.2016, has observed that the construction of transmission power service lines cannot be stopped for want of payment of compensation. However, an appropriate direction can be issued to the competent authority for determining the compensation in accordance with law and pay the same to the tenure holders over whose land the towers are being erected.
Allahabad High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - M C Tripathi - Full Document

Bijendra Kumar vs State Of U.P. And 4 Others on 18 July, 2023

7. This Court, in Writ C No.29995 of 2016 (Pooran Singh and 30 others vs. State of UP and 3 ors) decided on 5.7.2016, has observed that the construction of transmission power service lines cannot be stopped for want of payment of compensation. However, an appropriate direction can be issued to the competent authority for determining the compensation in accordance with law and pay the same to the tenure holders over whose land the towers are being erected.
Allahabad High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - M C Tripathi - Full Document

Meena Devi vs State Of U.P. And 3 Others on 18 July, 2023

7. This Court, in Writ C No.29995 of 2016 (Pooran Singh and 30 others vs. State of UP and 3 ors) decided on 5.7.2016, has observed that the construction of transmission power service lines cannot be stopped for want of payment of compensation. However, an appropriate direction can be issued to the competent authority for determining the compensation in accordance with law and pay the same to the tenure holders over whose land the towers are being erected.
Allahabad High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - M C Tripathi - Full Document

Umatuz Zahra vs State Of U.P. And 3 Others on 20 July, 2023

7. This Court, in Writ C No.29995 of 2016 (Pooran Singh and 30 others vs. State of UP and 3 ors) decided on 5.7.2016, has observed that the construction of transmission power service lines cannot be stopped for want of payment of compensation. However, an appropriate direction can be issued to the competent authority for determining the compensation in accordance with law and pay the same to the tenure holders over whose land the towers are being erected.
Allahabad High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - M C Tripathi - Full Document

Smt Ramavtari And Another vs State Of U.P. And 4 Others on 21 July, 2023

7. This Court, in Writ C No.29995 of 2016 (Pooran Singh and 30 others vs. State of UP and 3 ors) decided on 5.7.2016, has observed that the construction of transmission power service lines cannot be stopped for want of payment of compensation. However, an appropriate direction can be issued to the competent authority for determining the compensation in accordance with law and pay the same to the tenure holders over whose land the towers are being erected.
Allahabad High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - M C Tripathi - Full Document
1   2 3 Next