Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (0.51 seconds)
Documents citing D. Baliah And Ors. vs Secretary, Indian Detonators Limited on 2 April, 1975

Telecom Employees Co-Operative ... vs Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, ... on 23 August, 1990

However, Mr. Krishna Murthy would urge that this is a case where Rules have been framed and therefore this case is distinguishable. We are unable to accept this contention. When the very words "Subject to" have been so interpreted as "conditional upon" it is not possible for us to give any other interpretation. This Judgment has been referred to in D. Ballah v. Secretary, Indian Detonators Limited in which it was held in paragraph-7 as follows:
Karnataka High Court Cites 107 - Cited by 9 - S Mohan - Full Document

Pandian Roadways Corporation Ltd. vs The Principal District Judge And Ors. on 13 August, 1996

14. D. Balliah v. Secretary, I.D. Limited (supra). In this case it has been held that "Deduction in wages is penal in nature". Hence the principle of natural justice requires the notice. In this case, the deduction was for absence, for the period of strike which the employer termed as 'illegal'. The learned Judges took the view that the deduction was penal in nature, therefore, the necessity of notice was stressed in the said case.
Madras High Court Cites 16 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

General Manager, India Cements Ltd. vs Subramanian N.S. on 29 September, 1997

Rwlying on the above decision, Mr. Jayaraman submitted that as in the said A.P. Case, the principles of natural justice have also been complied with in the instant case and individual notices were also given to all the workers and therefore, the notice given is sufficient so long as the workers concerned and that they were made aware of the proposed deduction.
Madras High Court Cites 17 - Cited by 1 - A R Lakshmanan - Full Document

The Chief General Manager, Hpcl, ... vs The General Secretary, Hpcl Employees ... on 27 March, 2017

Turning to the decision in D.Balaiah v. The Secretary, Indian Detonators Ltd, Kukatpalli, Hyderabad relied upon by learned counsel for both the sides, it is to be noted that the issue is as to whether a notice ought to have been given to each individual employee before the penal wage cut was imposed. In this cited decision, the facts disclose that a general notice was displayed on the notice board but, individual notices were not given to the workmen. This Court held that while it is true that notice should be given, it is not necessary it should be given in any particular form nor is it necessary that it should be sent individually. This Court also held that a general notice is sufficient so long as the workers concerned were made aware of the proposed deduction. In the case on hand, a general notice was displayed on all the notice boards is undisputed.
Andhra HC (Pre-Telangana) Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - M S Murti - Full Document
1