Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.20 seconds)

Datar Singh vs State Of M.P. And Ors. on 2 September, 1997

See : (i) Dhula Bhai v. State of M.P., 1969 MPU 1 (SC) = AIR 1969 SC 78, (ii) B. M. Lakhani v. M. C. Malkapur, AIR 1970 SC 1002, (iii) Munshi Rani v. Chheharta M. C, AIR 1979 SC 1250, (iv) Firm Seth Radha Krishan v. Administrator, M. C. Ludhiana, AIR 1963 SC 1547, Firm Suraj Mal v. Municipal Board, Ganganagar, AIR 1979 SC 246, and (iv) Swadeshi Industry Ltd. v. Administrator, Panihati Municipality, AIR 1959 Cal. 411.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 8 - Full Document

M.L. Dalmiya And Company Limited vs Pragati Engineering Pvt. Limited And ... on 8 March, 1989

In Swadeshi Industries Ltd. v. Administrator, Panihati Municipality , High Court granted an injunction in the particular circumstances of the case. The rate payer challenged the authority of the person dealing with the appeal against assessment and prayed for injunction restraining the Municipality from realising Municipal taxes on the basis of impugned assessment. High Court repelled the argument that injunction restraining realisation of taxes is not to be granted since Municipality is rich enough to repay the excess payment, if any and granted injunction. Injunction may therefore be granted even in a money claim also and we do not as we obviously cannot propose to lay down any proposition to the contrary.. But in the instant case, we do not propose to grant the discretionary relief since the appellant would not suffer any irreparable injury if it ultimately succeeds in its Suit, even though no interlocutory injunction is granted. We do not, therefore, interfere with the impugned order passed by the lower court.
Calcutta High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1