Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 112 (1.43 seconds)
Documents citing Gopalakrishna Pillai And Others vs Meenakshi Ayal And Others on 31 March, 1966

Lakshmi Ammal (Deceased) And Ors. vs Subba Raj And Ors. on 15 March, 1974

The decision of this Court in Babburu Basavayya and Ors. v. Babburu Guravayya and Ors. , was also cited in the decision in Gopalakrishna Pillai and Ors. v. Meenakshi Ayal and Ors. . While relying on the judgment for holding that a plaint need pray only for past mesne profits, but need not pray specifically for future mesne profits in order to enable the Court to award future mesne profits, the Supreme Court did not go further and state that the decision of this Court in so far as it stated that in cases where there was no prayer for past mesne profits the Court had no jurisdiction to grant a decree for future mesne profits is not correct.
Madras High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - V Ramaswami - Full Document

Subba Reddiar vs Hazra Bibi on 8 February, 1972

6. A reference to a later decision of the Supreme Court reported in Gopalakrishna Pillai v. Meenakshi Ayal, , fortifies the view, though that case too dealt with a claim for mesne profits under O. XX, R. 12, Civil P. C. In that case the plaintiffs filed a suit for possession of specific items and the High Court passed a decree for recovery of possession of the items and also declared that the plaintiffs are entitled to mesne profits for three years prior to the suit and future mesne profits to be enquired into under Order XX Rule 12, Civil P. C. The objection before the Supreme Court was that there was no specific prayer for the decree for mesne profits subsequent to the institution of the suit and the High Court, therefore, had no jurisdiction to pass a decree for such future profits. It was in this context that the counsel for the defendant-appellants relied upon the decision of the Supreme Court in in support of his contention that if future mesne profits were not asked for in the plaint the Court would have no jurisdiction to award.
Madras High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 19 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next