Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.44 seconds)

Gopa Sastri vs The State Of West Bengal & Anr on 31 March, 2023

5. Refuting such contention Mr. Swapan Mallick, learned Counsel for the opposite party no. 2 submits that when charge sheet has been submitted by the police, after investigation it is to be presumed that police collected evidence, sufficient to send the petitioner for trial as an accused person. The Court, therefore, at this stage, may impose self restraint from invoking the provision of Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. to interfere with the order impugned. The accused persons including the petitioner should join the trial. To buttress his points Mr. Mallick places reliance upon the judgement of Hon'ble Apex Court pronounced in the case of Indu Jain vs. State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors. reported in (2009) 3 SCC (Cri) 996; Soma Chakraborty vs. State (through CBI) reported in (2007) 2 SCC (Cri) 514; Bhawna Bai vs. Ghanshyam & Ors. reported in (2020) 1 SCC (Cri) 581; Mustaq Ahmed vs. Md. Habibur Rahaman Faizi & Ors. reported in (1996) CCRLR (SC) 199.
Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side) Cites 31 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Abdul Malik(Since Deceased) And 11 ... vs Mushtaq Ahmad And 3 Others on 7 December, 2017

2. Present petition has been filed for setting aside the judgment and order dated 13.11.2017 passed by Additional District Judge, Court No. 3, Saharanpur in Rent Control Appeal No. 18 of 2011 (Abdul Malik vs. Mushtaq Ahmad) and the order dated 30.5.2011 passed by Prescribed Authority / Judge Small Causes Court, Saharanpur in P.A. Case No. 17 of 1999 (Mushtaq Ahmad vs. Abdul Malik).
Allahabad High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - V K Birla - Full Document
1