Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 25 (1.32 seconds)

Reshmi Devi vs State Of Hy.Etc on 17 November, 2020

13. Additionally, it is seen that the Petitioner has sought to place reliance on the fact that another writ petition viz., CWP No. 11009 of 2002 (Smt. Vidhya Devi v. State of Haryana) challenging the same very acquisition proceedings has been filed in this Court. Today, Mr. Ankur Mittal, Additional Advocate General, Haryana, informs the Court that the said writ petition stood dismissed by this Court and that no SLP has been filed in the Supreme Court against the said judgment.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - S Muralidhar - Full Document

Vidya Devi vs State Of Haryana And Ors on 24 August, 2022

LPA-317-2020 In the present appeal there is challenge to the order of the learned Single Judge, passed in CWP No.21016 of 2010 titled as Smt. Vidya Devi Vs. State of Haryana, wherein the learned Single Judge, 1 of 4 ::: Downloaded on - 31-08-2022 20:36:47 ::: LPA-317-2020 -2- has not granted the benefit of the relief of compassionate appointment by noting that the appellant's son had attained the age of 17 years on 13.09.2005 and his case was to be considered during 06 months after attaining the age of 17 years till 13.03.2006. It was noticed that the writ- petitioner never applied for compassionate appointment for her son Parveen Kumar at the time he attained the age of 17 years or even till three years thereafter, as the application was made on 30.10.2008 and, therefore, his case could not be forwarded and considered.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - G S Sandhawalia - Full Document

Rani Devi vs State Of Haryana & Ors on 16 November, 2018

At this stage, present petition is being disposed of by giving direction to the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner and pass appropriate order regularizing her service keeping in view the judgment passed in Vidya Devi's case (supra), instructions dated 25.02.2011 (Annexure P-5) and order(s) (Annexure P-9), within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - R Bahri - Full Document

Sheela And Others vs State Of Haryana And Others on 15 January, 2013

Petitioners, who are part time Sweepers and have been working since the year 1996 onwards, have approached this Court claiming regularization of their services as similarly situated persons have been regularized. Reliance has also been placed on a Division Bench Judgment of this Court passed in CWP No.5296 of 2001 titled as Vidya Devi and others vs. State of Haryana and others, decided on 20.2.2002. Even the respondents have also accepted the said judgment after the dismissal of the SLP filed against it and accordingly framed a policy for regularisation. Claiming the same relief, as has been made in the present Writ Petition. Petitioners have served a legal notice dated 14.8.2012 (Annexure P-3) on the respondents but till date no decision thereon has been taken and conveyed to the petitioners.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - T S Dhindsa - Full Document

Rajender And Others vs State Of Haryana And Others on 16 January, 2013

Petitioners, who are part time Sweepers and have been working since the year 1991, have approached this Court claiming regularization of their services as similarly situated persons have been regularized. Reliance has also been placed on a Division Bench Judgment of this Court passed in CWP No.5296 of 2001 titled as Vidya Devi and others vs. State of Haryana and others, decided on 20.2.2002. Even the respondents have also accepted the said judgment after the dismissal of the SLP filed against it and accordingly framed a policy for regularisation. Claiming the same relief, as has been made in the present Writ Petition. Petitioners have served a legal notice dated 14.8.2012 (Annexure P-4) on the respondents but till date no decision thereon has been taken and conveyed to the petitioners.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - T S Dhindsa - Full Document

Bhagwanti Devi And Others vs State Of Haryana And Others on 14 January, 2013

Petitioners, who are part time Sweepers and have been working since the year 1990, have approached this Court claiming regularization of their services as similarly situated persons have been regularized. Reliance has also been placed on a Division Bench Judgment of this Court passed in CWP No.5296 of 2001 titled as Vidya Devi and others vs. State of Haryana and others, decided on 20.2.2002. Even the respondents have also accepted the said judgment after the dismissal of the SLP filed against it and accordingly framed a policy for regularisation. Claiming the same relief, as has been made in the present Writ Petition. Petitioners have served a legal notice dated 14.8.2012 (Annexure P-4) on the respondents but till date no decision thereon has been taken and conveyed to the petitioners.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - T S Dhindsa - Full Document

Dayal Kaur And Others vs State Of Haryana & Others --Respondents on 25 January, 2013

TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA.J It is stated that the petitioners have been working as part time Sweepers under the Department of Education, State of Haryana continuously since the year 1992. They have approached this Court claiming benefit of regularization of their services on the ground that similarly situated employees have since been granted the requisite benefit. Reliance is also being placed on a Division Bench judgement of this Court passed in CWP No. 5296 of 2001 titled as Vidya Devi and others Vs. State of Haryana and others decided on 20.2.2002.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - T S Dhindsa - Full Document

Vinod Kumar And Others vs State Of Haryana & Others --Respondents on 25 January, 2013

TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA.J It is stated that the petitioners have been working as part time Sweepers/Peons under the Department of Education, State of Haryana continuously since the year 1992. They have approached this Court claiming benefit of regularization of their services on the ground that similarly situated employees have since been granted the requisite benefit. Reliance is also being placed on a Division Bench judgement of this Court passed in CWP No. 5296 of 2001 titled as Vidya Devi and others Vs. State of Haryana and others decided on 20.2.2002.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - T S Dhindsa - Full Document

Rajbir And Others vs State Of Haryana & Others on 22 February, 2013

Petitioners, who are part time Sweepers and have been working since 1990, have approached this Court claiming regularization of their services as similarly situated persons have been regularized. Reliance has also been placed on a Division Bench Judgment of this Court passed in CWP No.5926 of 2001 titled as Vidya Devi and others vs. State of Haryana and others, decided on 20.02.2002. Even the respondents have also accepted the said judgment after the dismissal of the SLP filed against it and accordingly framed a policy for regularization. Claiming the same relief, as has been made in the present writ petition, petitioners have served a legal notice dated 17.07.2011 (Annexure P-3) on the respondents but till date no decision thereon has been taken and conveyed to the petitioners.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - T S Dhindsa - Full Document

Ramesh Chand And Others vs State Of Haryana & Others on 22 February, 2013

Petitioners, who are part time Sweepers and have been working since 1990, have approached this Court claiming regularization of their services as similarly situated persons have been regularized. Reliance has also been placed on a Division Bench Judgment of this Court passed in CWP No.5926 of 2001 titled as Vidya Devi and others vs. State of Haryana and others, decided on 20.02.2002. Even the respondents have also accepted the said judgment after the dismissal of the SLP filed against it and accordingly framed a policy for regularization. Claiming the same relief, as has been made in the present writ petition, petitioners have served a legal notice dated 17.07.2011 (Annexure P-3) on the respondents but till date no decision thereon has been taken and conveyed to the petitioners.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - T S Dhindsa - Full Document
1   2 3 Next