Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (2.27 seconds)

Venkataramana vs The Inspector Of Police

8. Similarly in a case in MANU/DE/3601/2018 (Gautam Navlakha ..vs.. State (NCT of Delhi) and Others) (cited supra), case diary was written in Marathi, which was not understood by accused and the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate while remanding that accused, came to the conclusion that non compliance of mandatory requirements of Article 22 (1) and Article 22(2) of the Constitution and Section 167 read with Section 57 and 41 (1) (ba) of Cr.P.C, which are mandatory in nature, is unsustainable and therefore, the transit remand was set aside.

Ramamurthy vs The Inspector Of Police

8. Similarly in a case in MANU/DE/3601/2018 (Gautam Navlakha ..vs.. State (NCT of Delhi) and Others) (cited supra), case diary was written in Marathi, which was not understood by accused and the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate while remanding that accused, came to the conclusion that non compliance of mandatory requirements of Article 22 (1) and Article 22(2) of the Constitution and Section 167 read with Section 57 and 41 (1) (ba) of Cr.P.C, which are mandatory in nature, is unsustainable and therefore, the transit remand was set aside.
1