Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (0.68 seconds)
Documents citing Patel Jathabhai Punajbhai vs North Gujarat University And Anr on 28 January, 2015

The State Of Maharashtra And Another vs Kiran Shantaram Dahanukar And Others on 22 February, 2019

(20) First Appeal No. 1745/2014 & First Appeal No.1750 / 2014 Vs. SLAO and others" [2012 AIR (SCW 3986], "Mohinder Singh & ors. Vs. State of Haryana" [ (2014) 8 SCC 897], "Patel Jathabhai Punajbhai Vs. North Gujarat University and anr." [(2015) 3 SCC 650], "Indian Council of Medical Research Vs. T.N. Sanikop and others" [2015 AIR (SCW) 133], "Kasturi and others Vs. State of Haryana" (AIR 2003 SC 202), " Mehrawal Khewaji Trust Vs. State of Punjab"
Bombay High Court Cites 19 - Cited by 0 - T V Nalawade - Full Document

The State Of Maharashtra And Another vs Unitech Limited on 22 February, 2019

(20) First Appeal No. 1745/2014 & First Appeal No.1750 / 2014 Vs. SLAO and others" [2012 AIR (SCW 3986], "Mohinder Singh & ors. Vs. State of Haryana" [ (2014) 8 SCC 897], "Patel Jathabhai Punajbhai Vs. North Gujarat University and anr." [(2015) 3 SCC 650], "Indian Council of Medical Research Vs. T.N. Sanikop and others" [2015 AIR (SCW) 133], "Kasturi and others Vs. State of Haryana" (AIR 2003 SC 202), " Mehrawal Khewaji Trust Vs. State of Punjab"
Bombay High Court Cites 19 - Cited by 0 - T V Nalawade - Full Document

Joshi Bhalchandra Shankarlal vs State Of Gujarat on 20 June, 2025

"8. The perusal of the valuation report dated 15.5.2001 for the valuation of the land at Village Dangarva, which is at Item No.5 of the Valuation Report shows that the land was to be allotted by the State Government to the Central Government for construction of Telephone Exchange at Staff Quarters. It further shows that after considering the location of the land, the valuation was arrived at Rs.588/- per sq. mtrs., and thereafter since it was to be used for commercial purpose, 30% is added and the market value was assessed at Rs.780/- per sq. mtrs. It further shows that the land was bearing Survey No.3 in village site, which was being used for dumping of waste. Therefore, the other location is considered by the Valuation Committee for the purpose of valuation. The said valuation report has come in the evidence of the claimant as well as the officer of the Valuation Department, who was also examined. On the aspects of valuation of the land made for allotment to the Central Government, there is no evidence to the contrary. Under these circumstances, the reliance placed by the Reference Court upon the valuation report could not be said to be erroneous. It may be recorded that this Court, in its decision in the case of State of Gujarat (supra), at paragraphs 21 to 28 had observed as under:-
Gujarat High Court Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - S K Vishen - Full Document

Superintendent Archaeologist vs Patel Harilal Khodidas Patel on 3 May, 2019

11. Even for the lands situated at Village Samalpati which were acquired for the campus of North Gujarat University, the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Patel Jathabhai Punajbhai Vs. North Gujarat University & Anr., 2015 (1) Scale 696, has observed thus in Paragraphs 3, 4, 6 and 8, which reads as under:­ Page 10 of 15 Downloaded on : Mon Jul 01 01:22:58 IST 2019 C/FA/1066/2015 JUDGMENT "3. It is not in dispute that around the land in question, development has already been made. Nearby to the land in question are colleges like Polytechnic, Arts, Science and Commerce. On the Eastern side of the land is the State Highway Deesa­ Patan­Chanasma­Viramgam and on Southern side of the road is the road to enter Patan city. Railway station is also nearby. On the Western side in the nearby area are bus stand, T.V. relay centre, Telephone and telegraph head office.
Gujarat High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 2 - R M Chhaya - Full Document
1