Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.42 seconds)
Documents citing Satish Sadan vs Prithvi Raj And Anr. on 17 March, 1989

Guggan And Ors.Through Its Lrs vs State And Ors on 8 July, 2024

20. Also, as already discussed above in a catena of judgments viz. Satish Sadan (supra) and R.S. Bhutani (supra), in the absence of any formal preliminary order under Section 145(1) Cr.P.C. the whole proceedings culminating in the final order would be vitiated. The Ld. SDM vide the impugned order has only relied on the attachment order dated 06.11.1974 but has failed to assess as to who was in immediate possession at that time or whether which party was forcibly dispossessed prior to the said order, which is a mandatory requirement.
Delhi District Court Cites 26 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sh. Satish Kapur vs Delhi Photo Company on 19 February, 2011

(V) Special Power of Attorney dated 15­4­1988 attested by Notary on 15­4­88 related to suit property and other property by all the co­sharers in favour of Satish Kapoor authorizing him to get registered the release deed. (VI) In petition u/s 482 CPC Criminal Miscellaneous (M) 36 of 1983 which was decided on 17­3­1989 , titled as Satish Sadan Vs. Prithvi Raj & Anothers. In that petition petitioner Satish Kapur is admittedly one of the landlord with regard to the subject matter i.e shop/ garrage no:78(5), Tolstoy Lane, Connaught Place, New Delhi.
Delhi District Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1