Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 25 (0.72 seconds)

C.Ramakrishnan vs State By Deputy Superintendent Of ... on 26 February, 2019

In the cases of Kamesh Panjiyar alias Kamlesh Panjiyar Vs. State of Bihar [2005-2-SCC-388], Ram Badan Sharma Vs. State of Bihar with Surya Kant Sharma Vs. State of Bihar [2006-10-SCC-115], Kailash Vs. State of MP [2006-12-SCC-667], the Honourable Supreme Court reiterated and reasserted the settled principles laid down in the case of Hira Lal and others Vs. State (Government of NCT), Delhi [2003-8-SCC-80], wherein the essential ingredients to attract application under Section 304B are stated.
Madras High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - A D Chandira - Full Document

Devi Lal vs State Of Rajasthan on 12 October, 2007

(1) That the death of the woman was caused by any burns or bodily injury or in some circumstances which were not normal; (2) such death occurs within 7 years from the date of her marriage; (3) that the victim was subjected to cruelty or harassment by her husband or any relative of her husband; (4) such cruelty or harassment should be for or in connection with the demand of dowry; and (5) it is established that such cruelty and harassment was made soon before her death. {See Harjit Singh v. State of Punjab [(2006) 1 SCC 463]; Ram Badan Sharma v. State of Bihar [(2006) 10 SCC 115]}
Supreme Court of India Cites 9 - Cited by 45 - S B Sinha - Full Document

Kashmir Kaur & Anr vs State Of Punjab on 12 December, 2012

(1) that the death of the woman was caused by any burns or bodily injury or in some circumstances which were not normal; (2) such death occurs within 7 years from the date of her marriage; (3) that the victim was subjected to cruelty or harassment by her husband or any relative of her husband; (4) such cruelty or harassment should be for or in connection with the demand of dowry; and (5) it is established that such cruelty and harassment was made soon before her death. (See Harjit Singh v. State of Punjab and Ram Badan Sharma v. State of Bihar).”
Supreme Court of India Cites 13 - Cited by 56 - Full Document

T.Kannadasan vs State By Inspector Of Police on 11 December, 2009

In the cases of Kamesh Panjiyar alias Kamlesh Panjiyar Vs. State of Bihar [2005-2-SCC-388], Ram Badan Sharma Vs. State of Bihar with Surya Kant Sharma Vs. State of Bihar [2006-10-SCC-115], Kailash Vs. State of MP [2006-12-SCC-667], the Honourable Supreme Court reiterated and reasserted the settled principles laid down in the case of Hira Lal and others Vs. State (Government of NCT), Delhi [2003-8-SCC-80], wherein the essential ingredients to attract application under Section 304B are stated.
Madras High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - A Jagadeesan - Full Document
1   2 3 Next