Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.25 seconds)
Documents citing Rm. Palaniappan vs The Transport Commissioner on 10 November, 2006

V.Vijaya Samundeeswaran vs The Secretary To Government on 18 March, 2010

9. This Court also has considered the various Judgments of the Hon'ble Supreme Court and this Court cited by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner reported in 2004 (2) CTC 301 (Shri Bhagwan Lal Arya Vs. Commissioner of Police and others), (2010) 1 MLJ 714 (V.P.Chellappa Vs. The Superintending Engineer and others), (2006) 4 MLJ 1382 (K.Kandasamy Vs. The Deputy Inspector-General of Police and another), (2006) 4 MLJ 1008 (J.Patrick Vs. The Government of Tamil Nadu and others), (2006) 1 MLJ 48 (RM.Palaniappan Vs. The Transport Commissioner and others) and 2005 (4) CTC 390 (Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Madurai) Limited Vs. The Presiding Officer and another).
Madras High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - T Raja - Full Document

V.Pachaiyappan vs The Superintendent Of Police on 10 October, 2011

18.Even in W.A.No.58 of 2011, the appellant has committed series of allegations, the Division Bench, taking into account the position of the family of the Government employee, interfered with the extreme punishment of dismissal from service and modified into some other punishment. Likewise, I am of the view that the said judgment is also applicable to this case.
Madras High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - D Hariparanthaman - Full Document

T.Amudha vs The Director Of Public Health & on 27 March, 2018

In support of his submission, the learned counsel would rely on the recent decision passed by this Court in W.P.No.9294 of 2008, dated 05.12.2017, wherein, the learned Judge of this Court has modified the penalty of removal from service into one of compulsory retirement by following the strong observation made by the learned Division Bench of this Court in the case of RM.Palaniappan Vs. The Transport Commissioner, Chepauk & Others, reported in 2006 (1) MLJ 48. The learned Judge of this Court in the above said decision has incorporated the observations of the learned Division Bench and finally set aside the penalty of removal from service and substituted the compulsory retirement. The findings and the decision of the learned Judge as found in paragraph Nos.8 to 12, are reproduced below:-
Madras High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - V Parthiban - Full Document
1