Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.34 seconds)

Bharath Bhooshan K vs State Of Kerala on 11 January, 2024

In Gopinatha Menon (Kenathachan) v. Malabar Devaswom Board [2012:KER:16515] a Division Bench of this Court held that recourse to sub-section (2) of Section 39 of the Act, is not necessary to make an appointment of a non-hereditary trustee on any ground referable to the conduct of the hereditary trustee, or otherwise, when there is a scheme governing the trust, which provides, among other things, for appointment of four non-hereditary trustees.
Kerala High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - A Narendran - Full Document

C.Gopinathan vs State Of Kerala on 12 April, 2024

In Gopinatha Menon (Kenathachan) v. Malabar Devaswom Board [2012:KER:16515] a Division Bench of this Court held that recourse to sub-section (2) of Section 39 of the Act, is not necessary to make an appointment of a non-hereditary trustee on any ground referable to the conduct of the hereditary trustee, or otherwise, when there is a scheme governing the trust, which provides, among other things, for appointment of four non- hereditary trustees.
Kerala High Court Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - A Narendran - Full Document

Chandini M vs State Of Kerala on 27 June, 2024

In Gopinatha Menon (Kenathachan) v. Malabar Devaswom Board [2012:KER:16515] a Division Bench of this Court held that recourse to sub-section (2) of Section 39 of the Act, is not necessary to make an appointment of a non-hereditary trustee on any ground referable to the conduct of the hereditary trustee, or otherwise, when there is a scheme governing the trust, which provides, among other things, for appointment of four non- hereditary trustees.
Kerala High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - A Narendran - Full Document

Pavithran P V vs Jayakrishnan P.K on 7 October, 2025

5.​ Resultantly, there will be a direction to the 4th respondent to consider and dispose of Ext.P11 in the light of the observations made by this Court in Chathu Achan (supra) and Gopinatha Menon (supra), with notice to the petitioner and other affected parties, and take appropriate decision expeditiously, in any event, within a period of 6 weeks from the date of production of a copy of this judgment.
1