Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 229 (0.05 seconds)
Documents citing Union Of India & Ors vs Kali Dass Batish & Anr on 5 January, 2006

James K.Joseph vs Government Of India on 18 February, 2009

It is also now well settled by a series of decisions of the Apex Court including the decision in Union of India and others v. Kali Das Batish and another (supra) that the mere inclusion of a candidate in the select list does not confer on him a right to be appointed and that if there was no right, there could be no occasion to maintain a writ petition for the enforcement of a non-existing right. Therefore, the petitioner cannot, in my considered opinion, assail the decision taken by the Government of India not to appoint him as Administrative Member of the CAT.
Kerala High Court Cites 20 - Cited by 1 - P N Ravindran - Full Document

B Ramakoteswara Rao vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh on 21 February, 2024

64. The Hon'ble Supreme Court, while considering the challenge to the appointment to the post of judicial member in the Central Administrative Tribunal, had again gone into the question of judicial review 67 RNTJ & RRR,J W.P.No.14445 of 2023 relating to the concurrence given by the Hon'ble Chief Justice of India in Union of India and Ors., vs. Kali Dass Batish & Anr., (20 supra) had held as follows:
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 53 - Cited by 0 - R R Rao - Full Document

S.Pandiarajan vs The Government Of Tamilnadu on 16 July, 2012

39. The verification of antecedents was declared as relevant by the Full Bench of the Apex Court even earlier in Union of India and others v. Kali Dass Batish and another, (2006) 1 SCC 779, while dealing with the appointment of an Executive Officer of the Central Administrative Tribunal constituted under Article 323-A of the Constitution of India. In that case it was also held that mere inclusion of a person in the select list does not confer on him any right. It is apposite to extract the following paragraphs of the said decision:
Madras High Court Cites 67 - Cited by 1 - P Jyothimani - Full Document

Navneet Kumar vs U.O.I.Through Secy.Deptt.Of ... on 27 August, 2021

Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Union of India and others vs. Kali Dass Batish (supra) has observed that if the legislature has reposed faith in the Chief Justice of India as the pater familias of the Judicial hierarchy in the country, it is not open to contend that the Chief Justice of India might have given his concurrence without application of mind or without calling for necessary inputs.
Allahabad High Court Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - D K Upadhyaya - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next