citedby: 2018490

Paramjit Kaur vs State Of Punjab on 6 October, 2010

In Raghu Nath Bansal's case (supra), no independent examined- Accused (SDO in electricity board) alleged to have accepted illegal gratification of Rs.2000/-- Official witness and police official reported the bribe money was recovered from the accused, but no independent witness examined- Held, mere recovery of the tainted currency notes from the accused not sufficient to convict accused under Sections 7 and 13(2) of the Act.

Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - J Singh - Full Document

State Of Haryana vs Rakesh Garg on 17 January, 2013

The same views were followed by our own Hon'ble High Court in the case of Raghu Nath Bansal versus State of Punjab as reported in 2010(2) RCR (Criminal)-445and it was laid down that there has to be an independent witness evidencing the recovery or acceptance of tainted money and mere recovery of tainted money from the accused is not sufficient to pas the judgment of conviction. The case in hand is no much higher footing in as much as the recovery of the tainted currency notes is not from the person of the accused and there is no independent corroboration to the story of the prosecution.

Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 29 - Cited by 0 - P Singh - Full Document

Gulzar Singh vs State Of Punjab on 30 May, 2011

Raghu Nath Bansal's case (Supra) is also distinguishable, as in that case motive for the occurrence was not proved. Shadow witness, who could prove the demand and acceptance was also not examined, which facts are missing in the present case.

Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - K C Puri - Full Document

Ashok Kumar vs State Of Punjab on 31 August, 2012

In authority Raghu Nath Bansal 's case (supra) the complainant was inimical towards the accused which fact has been proved on the file.

Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - K C Puri - Full Document

Rattan Kumar vs State Of Punjab on 14 November, 2013

In support of his arguments, learned counsel has placed reliance on Raghu Nath Bansal Vs. State of Punjab 2010 (2) R.C.R. (Criminal) 445 wherein it was held that mere recovery of tainted currency notes from the accused was not sufficient to order his conviction under Section 7 and 13 (2) of the Act.

Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Sabina - Full Document

Om Parkash vs State Of Hy on 21 January, 2015

So, the appellant cannot derive benefit of the authority Raghu Nath Bansal's case (supra).

Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - K C Puri - Full Document

Search Results Page

Refine Search