Sanchita @ Shilpi vs State on 10 February, 2022
(ii) Asim alias Munmun alias Asif Abdulkarim Solanki vs.
State of Gujarat, reported in 2020 SCC OnLine SC 1098;
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 18 (1.31 seconds)Documents citing
Asim @ Munmun @ Asif Abdulkarim Solanki vs The State Of Gujarat on 28 January, 2020
Sharad Chandra @ Sharat Chandra vs State Of Rajasthan on 10 February, 2022
(ii) Asim alias Munmun alias Asif Abdulkarim Solanki vs.
State of Gujarat, reported in 2020 SCC OnLine SC 1098;
Cherukurivenkateswara Prasad, vs Chellasubbaraidu, on 19 September, 2022
30. At this juncture, it may also be apposite to refer to the
opinion of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Asim @ Munmun
@ Asif Abdulkarim Solanki v. State of Gujarat11, which
reads thus:
Sandeep Suman @ Pushpanjay vs The State Of Bihar on 1 February, 2023
Reliance is also
placed on the consequential Judgment of the Hon'ble Gujarat High
Court in the said matter, i.e., Asim @ Munmun @ Asif Abdulkarim
Vs. State of Gujarat, decided on 29th September, 2021, whereby
after remand of the matter, Hon'ble Gujarat High Court was pleased
to allow the application under Section 391 of the Code of Criminal
Procedure filed by the appellant/accused therein.
R.Ganesh vs The State Rep on 12 September, 2023
22. Hon'ble Supreme Court in Asim @ Munmun @ Asif Abdulkarim
Solanki Vs. The State of Gujarat reported in 2020 SCC OnLine SC 1098,
directed to dispose the application immediately, it held as follows:
Shiju K Samuel vs Anil Kumar Jain on 4 September, 2025
In view of aforesaid and principle laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in
Rambhau (supra), principle laid down by Hon'ble Apex Court in Asim @
Munmun (supra) does not help applicant in any manner whatsoever.
Mohammed Qayyum vs P. Madanmohan on 4 November, 2022
7. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in Criminal Appeal No.184 of
2020 in the case of Asim alias Asif Abdulkarim Solanki v. The
State of Gujarat, dated 28.01.2020 observed as follows:
Sanil Prakash Sahu vs Registrar Of Companies Ministry Of ... on 4 September, 2023
6. They refer the fact that an application under Section 391 of Cr.P.C.
was preferred at appellate stage for bringing additional facts/documents on
record but without deciding the same, final judgment has been passed. Learned
counsel for the petitioners relied upon the order dated 20.01.2020 passed by
Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Asim @ Munmun @ Asif Abdulkarim
Solanki Vs. The State of Gujarat reported in 2019 Lawsuit (Guj) 678 in
support of submission.
Wakila vs The State Of Delhi on 10 January, 2024
4. While dismissing the appeal, the learned Single Judge of the
Delhi High Court did not advert to the pending application
bearing Application No.916 of 2011 invoking Section 391 of the
Cr.P.C. The aforesaid procedure adopted is contrary to the law
laid down by this Court in Asim Alias Munmum Alias Asif
Abdulkarim Solanki versus State of Gujarat reported in (2021) 16
SCC 459.
Suman Kukreja vs M/S Lalit Transport Proprietorship ... on 6 February, 2025
In support of his contention, he has
placed reliance on a judgment passed by the Apex Court in the case of Asim vs.
State of Gujarat reported in (2021) 16 SCC 459, in which the Apex Court has held
that " we are of the opinion that it is desirable that an application filed under
Section 391 should be heard immediately after it is filed without waiting for the
appeal to be finally heard".