Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.21 seconds)

P.Xavier vs / on 26 April, 2022

11.For the foregoing reasons, this Court directs the respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 01.04.2022 and pass final orders, once the petitioner obtains Environment Clearance from the 7/10 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.7897 of 2022 SEIAA, after affording a fair hearing to the petitioner including granting him the right of personal hearing, in the light of the following decision of this Court dated 09.11.2020 passed in WP.(MD)Nos.9133 and 9137 of 2020 in the case of T.Vijay vs. The District Collector, Thoothukudi District, and in the light of the decisions of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the cases of Electrosteel Steels Limited vs. Union of India and others reported in 2021 SCC OnLine SC 1247 and Pahwa Plastics Pvt. Ltd. And Another vs. Dastak NGO and others reported in 2022 SCC OnLine SC 362, within a period of ten (10) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
Madras High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - A Quddhose - Full Document

P.Xavier vs The District Collector on 15 December, 2023

11.For the foregoing reasons, this Court directs the respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 01.04.2022 and pass final orders, once the petitioner obtains Environment Clearance from the SEIAA, after affording a fair hearing to the petitioner including granting him the right of personal hearing, in the light of the following decision of this Court dated 09.11.2020 passed in WP.(MD)Nos.9133 and 9137 of 2020 in the case of T.Vijay vs. The District Collector, Thoothukudi District, and in the light of the decisions of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the cases of Electrosteel Steels Limited vs. Union of India and others reported in 2021 SCC OnLine SC 1247 and Pahwa Plastics Pvt. Ltd. And Another vs. Dastak NGO and others Page 4 of 10 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD) No.29180 of 2022 reported in 2022 SCC OnLine SC 362, within a period of ten (10) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.” Pursuant to the direction given by this Court, the District Collector, Thiruchirappalli took up the petitioner's application for consideration. Vide order dated 28.09.2022, the petitioner's request was negatived. Challenging the same, the present writ petition came to be filed.
1