Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 272 (3.07 seconds)
Documents citing Mohd. Khalid vs State Of West Bengal on 3 September, 2002

Page No.# 1/198 vs The Central Bureau Of Investigation on 27 September, 2022

In view of the law laid down in the case of Mohd. Khalid vs State (supra), on the face of the bulk of trustworthy evidence brought on record by the prosecution to establish the conspiracy theory leading to the serial bomb blasts, we are of the view that the confessional statement of Ajay Basumatary would be sufficient to convict Baisagi Basumatary even without any other corroborative evidence.
Gauhati High Court Cites 128 - Cited by 0 - S Shyam - Full Document

Khalid vs . State on 24 May, 2012

9. From the impugned order it is abundantly clear that the Board had made a comprehensive exercise to form an opinion that appellant required institutionalised care. Admittedly, appellant was found carrying heroin in the large quantity and he was well aware about the matrix of the transaction, this itself establishes that some one is using the appellant as a carrier of the Crl. Appeal No. 33/12 Page 3 of 4 Khalid vs. State contraband items. From the impugned order, it is also clear that Ruby, step mother of appellant and Safiya have no control over the appellant. If appellant is not properly care at this stage, there is every likelihood that appellant may become the victim of nefarious activities of unscrupulous persons. Thus, institutional care is in the benefit of juvenile.
Delhi District Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next