Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 21 (0.56 seconds)
Documents citing U.P.State Road Transport Corpn., ... vs Sanjeev Kumar & Ors. Etc on 1 September, 1998

State vs . Sanjeev Etc. on 26 April, 2010

State Vs. Sanjeev Etc. FIR No. 593/05 incriminating against any of the accused persons and PW4 is a formal witness being duty officer. In these circumstances, considering that the most material witnesses have not deposed anything incriminating against any of the accused persons to connect them with commission of alleged offences and have not identified them to be the assailants, hence both the accused namely Sanjeev and Sunny are acquitted of the charges levelled against them. Their sureties if any be discharged. Original documents be returned as per rules and endorsement on documents, if any be cancelled as per rules. File be consigned to record room after compliance of necessary legal formalities. Announced in the open Court (BARKHA GUPTA) on this 26th day of April, 2010 Additional Sessions Judge - IV Outer District - IV Rohini District Courts Delhi Contd.....
Delhi District Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs . Sanjeev Kumar on 12 February, 2016

6. In view of these facts and circumstances, it may be said that the prosecution has failed to prove the charge against the accused beyond reasonable doubt and therefore, the accused Sanjeev Kumar is acquitted of offence punishable u/s 28/112 Delhi Police Act. Announced in the open Court (DHEERAJ MITTAL) on this 12 day of February, 2016 th MM­03/PHC/NDD/ New Delhi DD No.17­A dated 10.03.11 PS Tughlak Road State Vs. Sanjeev Kumar
Delhi District Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Dr. Sanjeev Kumar And 2 Others vs State Of U.P. And Another on 28 May, 2024

Resultantly, present petition succeeds and Charge Sheet No. 16/2016 dated 10.04.2016 as well as cognizance order dated 23.07.2016 passed in Criminal Case No. 2680 of 2016; titled State of U.P. vs. Sanjeev Kumar and others, arising out of Case Crime No. 75 of 2015, under Sections 498A, 323, 506, 342 IPC and Section 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act, Police Station Mahila Thana, District Jhansi and the proceedings arising therefrom, are ordered to be quashed.
Allahabad High Court Cites 23 - Cited by 0 - S Gopal - Full Document

Dr. Sanjeev Kumar And 2 Others vs State Of U.P. And Another on 1 March, 2024

Resultantly, present petition succeeds and Charge Sheet No. 16/2016 dated 10.04.2016 as well as cognizance order dated 23.07.2016 passed in Criminal Case No. 2680 of 2016; titled State of U.P. vs. Sanjeev Kumar and others, arising out of Case Crime No. 75 of 2015, under Sections 498A, 323, 506, 342 IPC and Section 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act, Police Station Mahila Thana, District Jhansi and the proceedings arising therefrom, are ordered to be quashed.
Allahabad High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Rohit Agarwal vs State Of U.P. And Another on 9 October, 2023

11. The entire proceedings of Case No. 3574 of 2019, arising out of Case Crime No. 0486 of 2018 (State of U.P. Vs. Sanjeev Agarwal and other), under Sections 120-B, 409, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 506 I.P.C., Police Station Sadar Bazar, District Shahjahanpur pending in the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Shahjahanpur against the applicant are quashed in terms of compromise arrived at between the parties.
Allahabad High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Shiv Pratap Singh And 4 Others vs State Of U.P. And 2 Others on 12 November, 2024

Considering aforesaid facts, proceedings of S.T. No. 28 of 2023 (State of Uttar Pradesh versus Shiv Pratap Singh and others) and S.T. No. 92 of 2023 (State of Uttar Pradesh versus Sanjeev Kumar Singh and others) arising out of case crime No. 31 of 2022 under Sections 323, 504, 506, 325 & 364 IPC, P.S. Jalaun, District Jalaun against the applicants are quashed.
Allahabad High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - M Mathur - Full Document

Sanjiv Dhingra vs State on 3 February, 2024

Vide this common judgment, I shall dispose of two concatenated revision petitions under Section 397 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) against the impugned Orders dated 09.03.2022 and 28.03.2023 passed by Ld. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (Ld. CMM), South, Saket Courts, in Cr. Case No. 1741/2019, FIR No. 192/2017 PS EOW (South) titled as State Vs. Sanjiv Dhingra Etc. whereby charge for the offence punishable under Section 420/120B of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC, for short) was directed to be framed against the accused Sanjiv Dhingra (in this order, he shall be referred to as accused) and consequently framing the charge vide Order dated 28.03.2023 and discharge of the accused under section 409 IPC. For convenience, revisionist Ashutosh Kumar shall be referred to as complainant.
Delhi District Court Cites 24 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 Next