Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.40 seconds)
Documents citing P.S.R. Subrahmanyam And Ors. vs Commissioner Of Endowments And Ors. on 2 September, 1997

India vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh Rep. By Its ... on 17 November, 2021

In this case, no notification was issued as mandated under Section 22(a)(1)(e) of the Registration Act, the subject property is prohibited simply by inclusion of the property in prohibited property list and thereby such inclusion as a property is contrary to the Mandatory requirement under Section 22(a)(1)(e) of Registration Act and as per judgments of the High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad in "P.S.R. Subrahmanyam v. Commissioner of Endowments1" "Secretary to Government, Revenue Department v. Sri Swamy Ayyappa Co-Operative Society2,"S.Manikya Reddy v. the A.P. State Wakf Board, Rep. by its Chief Executive Officer, Hyderabad and another [W.P.No.29937/2013], "Sri Ganesha Parvathi Sametha Chodeswara Swamy Alaya Abhivruddi Sangam (Regd.No.430/2015) rep. by its President Sri S.Ramakum Vs. The State of Andhra Pradesh rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue (Endowments-I) Department and 7 others [W.P.No.34844/2017]", "Kum.
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

T. Vykunta Rao vs Commissioner Of Endowments And Ors. on 12 August, 1999

12. The learned Counsel also relied upon certain other decisions. The first one is in the case of PSR Subrahmanyam (1 supra), In this decision the dispute was with reference to the powers of the Commissioner to transfer an employee from one religious endowment or institution to another within the unit of eight institutions. There the contention of the petitioner was that the Government did not frame any rules dealing with the transfer of the office holders and servants, as provided Under Section 39. Therefore the transfers made by the Commissioner are not sustainable. The Division Bench of this Court rejected the said contention and upheld the orders of transfer relying upon the provisions of Section 39(1) whereby the Commissioner was specifically given power to transfer any office holder or servant attached to a charitable or religious institution or endowment from that institution or endowment to another institution or endowment. As there is no dispute with reference to the power of the Commissioner in the present writ petition the said case may not be of any assistance to the petitioner.
Andhra HC (Pre-Telangana) Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1