Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.63 seconds)
Documents citing Sanket Narain Pande vs Ram Bharos And Ors. on 24 March, 1924

Smt. Sulexna Verma vs Shri Vishal Verma on 25 October, 2016

3. Application under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC filed by  Smt. Sulexna Verma in another case titled as  Ram  Narain   Verma   Vs.   Ram Bharose & Ors.,  bearing   Suit Sulexna Verma Vs. Vishal Verma & Anr.                                  CS No.27/13 (ID No.1318/16)                                        Page: 14/13 No.26/02, decided on 29.01.2003 as  Ex.DW­ 3/1 (OSR).
Delhi District Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Venkatarama Aiyar vs Mirthinjaya Aiyar And Anr. on 11 November, 1930

See Sankar Narain Pande v. Ram Bharos (1924) 79 I.C. 1010 and Dhanraj Rai v. Ram Naresh Rai (1924) 79 I.C. 1019; and the Oudh Chief Court has also taken a similar view in Chokhey Singh v. Hardeo Singh (1921) 64 I.C. 757. Having regard to the express language of Section 6 of the Limitation Act which in terms refers to a "minor" I do not think that any other view is possible. In my opinion a person cannot be held to be a minor until he is born. Section 3 of the Indian Majority Act of 1875 relied on by the appellant which states that ...Subject as aforesaid, every other person domiciled in British India shall be deemed to have attained his majority when he shall have completed his age of eighteen years and not before.
Madras High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 1 - Full Document
1