Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.45 seconds)

Super Seal Flexible Hose Limited Thru ... vs State Of U.P. And 2 Others on 5 December, 2022

Further the Court finds that two firms had merged by an order of the Delhi High Court dated 22.11.2006 wherein it was held that the stamp duty, if any was payable by the transferee company, would be paid in accordance with law. Learned counsel for the petitioner has argued that any stamp duty which was payable on a merger had to be paid as per the law laid down in the judgment reported in 2009 (1) ADJ 569 : M/s. Hero Motors Ltd. vs. State of U.P. & Others and therefore, the question for paying stamp duty on the plant and machinery again did not arise. The Court definitely is of the view that the Prescribed Authority ought to have looked into this aspect of the matter. The merger had taken place between the transferor company namely M/s. Super Seals India Limited and the transferee company namely Super Seal Flexible Hose Limited as per the order of the Delhi High Court dated 22.11.2006. If any stamp duty had to be imposed, it must have been imposed at that point of time itself. What is more, the Court finds that even the stamp duty which was leviable at the time of the merger/demerger was also not a point in issue in the instant case. The only issue which was there before the Prescribed Authority was as to what was the property which was being leased out by the UPSIDC to the petitioner-company. The Court finds that only the land was the subject matter of the transfer by means of a lease.
Allahabad High Court Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - S Varma - Full Document

Indian City Properties Ltd. vs State Of U.P. And Others on 27 January, 2023

In M/s Hero Motors Ltd. Vs. State of U.P. 2009 (1) ADJ 569, this Court while considering the impact of Section 2 (10) and 2 (14) and Article 23 of Schedule I-B in matters relating amalgamation of one company with another held that a scheme of arrangement involves transfers of business. The consideration of a transfer under scheme of arrangement would be the shares allotted by the transferee company to the shareholders of the transferrers company. The valuation of shares would, therefore, be the consideration upon which stamp duty would be payable at the rate provided for conveyance of movable properties.
Allahabad High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - R R Agarwal - Full Document

The State Of Tamil Nadu vs M/S Serene Estate Private Limited on 19 February, 2024

He would also place reliance on the Judgment of the High Court of Allahabad in the case of Hero Motors Ltd., Vs. State of U.P. And Ors., 16 more particularly paragraph Nos.19,20 & 27 of the Judgment to contend that the scheme of arrangement involves business of a going concern and it involves transfer of assets and liabilities as one transaction. Therefore, he would submit that the action of the State in bringing the aggregate market value of the shares as a criteria would be appropriate and cannot be termed as irrelevant or colourable exercise power.
Madras High Court Cites 52 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1