Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 94 (0.78 seconds)
Documents citing Nepal Singh vs State Of U. P. Ors on 9 November, 1984

Arvind Kumar Sinha vs State Of U.P. And Others on 9 August, 2018

The decision in Nepal Singh v. State of U.P.27 was held to be per incuriam as in that case, Champaklal case12 was not considered, but the Court did observe that if on an overall assessment of the work and conduct of the employee the authority competent in that behalf to terminate the service, is satisfied that on account of the employee's general unsuitability and inefficiency or misconduct it would not be in the public interest to retain him in service, it may either terminate the services by an innocuous order or may proceed to take punitive action by holding a regular departmental enquiry. The Court, however, emphasised that the termination has to be in accordance with the terms and conditions of service regulated by the relevant rules.
Allahabad High Court Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Chandra Prakash Shahi vs State Of U.P. & Ors on 25 April, 2000

The decision in Nepal Singh vs. State of U.P. (1985) 1 SCC 56 = 1985 (2) SCR 1 = AIR 1985 SC 84 was held to be per incuriam as in that case, Champaklal's case (supra) was not considered, but the Court did observe that if on an overall assessment of the work and conduct of the employee the authority competent in that behalf to terminate the service, is satisfied that on account of the employee's general unsuitability and inefficiency or misconduct it would not be in the public interest to retain him in service, it may either terminate the services by an innocuous order or may proceed to take punitive action by holding a regular departmental enquiry. The Court, however, emphasised that the termination has to be in accordance with the terms and conditions of service regulated by relevant rules.
Supreme Court of India Cites 33 - Cited by 121 - S S Ahmad - Full Document

Chandra Prakash Shahi vs State Of U.P. & Ors on 25 April, 2000

The decision in Nepal Singh vs. State of U.P. (1985) 1 SCC 56 = 1985 (2) SCR 1 = AIR 1985 SC 84 was held to be per incuriam as in that case, Champaklal's case (supra) was not considered, but the Court did observe that if on an overall assessment of the work and conduct of the employee the authority competent in that behalf to terminate the service, is satisfied that on account of the employee's general unsuitability and inefficiency or misconduct it would not be in the public interest to retain him in service, it may either terminate the services by an innocuous order or may proceed to take punitive action by holding a regular departmental enquiry. The Court, however, emphasised that the termination has to be in accordance with the terms and conditions of service regulated by relevant rules.
Supreme Court of India Cites 33 - Cited by 306 - S S Ahmad - Full Document

Tapan vs Hon'Ble Chief Justice, High Court on 19 March, 1990

In Nepal Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh reported in 1980 2 Lab IC 161 the termination of temporary Sub-Inspector of Police in terms of the appointment order has been upheld even though the departmental enquiry against him was initiated and subsequently dropped. The authorities wanted to weed out officers whose performances were not satisfactory and as a result of that process terminated his services.
Calcutta High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Rajesh Kumar Mahato And Ors vs The State Of Bihar And Ors on 3 May, 2021

The decision in Nepal Singh vs. State of U.P. was held to be per incuriam as in that case, Champaklal's case (supra) was not considered, but the Court did observe that if on an overall assessment of the work and conduct of the employee the authority competent in that behalf to terminate the service, is satisfied that on account of the employee's general unsuitability and inefficiency or misconduct it would not be in the public interest to retain him in service, it may either terminate the services by an innocuous order or may proceed to take punitive action by holding a regular departmental enquiry.
Patna High Court Cites 81 - Cited by 1 - S Pandey - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next