Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.29 seconds)
Documents citing Surjit Kaur vs Tej Kaur And Ors on 30 September, 2014

Santosh Kumari vs Sneh Lata And Others on 14 November, 2014

Learned counsel for the respondents was quite justified in placing reliance on the judgement of this Court in Surjit Kaur Vs. Tej SURESH KUMAR 2014.11.19 16:31 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh CR No.5712 of 2011 5 Kaur and others (CR No.3478 of 2013, decided on 30.09.2014) in which similar proposition was involved. The plaintiffs-non-executants of the sale deed not in possession of suit property, sought declaration that the sale deeds were not binding on them and prayed for consequential relief of possession. It was held that they had to pay ad-valorem Court fee.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Shahnaz Husain vs Shamima Majid on 3 February, 2016

1. There is no merit for a person to contend that he has put up construction on the agricultural land and therefore, property cannot be treated as agricultural land. The consideration taken by the Court was that it was classified in the revenue records as cultivable land and a mere manner of enjoyment of the property cannot be a ground for assessing the market value of the property and pay ad valorem court fee thereon. The court fee will always be be required to be made only on the manner of assessment of the property in the revenue record and if it is not a house site and an agricultural land to put to use for non- agricultural purpose, it is immaterial for the purpose of court fee. The decision taken by the court below is correct. The counsel refers to a judgment of this Court in Surjit Kaur Vs. Tej Kaur and others 2015(1) PLR 750. This judgment will not apply in a situation where the property is stated to be a non-agricultural land. It makes no difference that the PANKAJ KUMAR 2016.02.08 12:46 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document C.R. No.664 of 2016 -2- proeprty is not used as an agricultural land.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - K Kannan - Full Document

Harbhagwan Singh vs Balwinder Singh And Ors on 6 October, 2016

In support of his contention, he has referred to judgments of this Court Surjit Kaur vs. Tej Kaur and others 2015 (3) RCR (Civil) 75, Sanjay Rana vs. Sampat Singh and others 2015 (8) RCR (Civil) 500, Surinder Singh and others v. Narinder Singh 2010 (4) RCR (Civil) 139 and Jaswinder Singh and others v. Jasbir Kaur and another along with connected matters, 2013 (1) RCR (Civil) 727.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - R Mittal - Full Document
1