Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.97 seconds)
Documents citing Ishwar Piraji Kalpatri vs State Of Maharashtra (Mhada) on 8 March, 2016

Mr. K. Velusamy vs State By Inspector Of Police on 24 May, 2017

36. The candid admission of the Sanctioning Authority, viz., L.W.1 Mr. K. Bharathan, Additional Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Chennai Region amounts to willful disobedience of the order of this Court. Not only he, but the act of the Investigating Officer viz., L.W.60 Mr. C.Sudarsan had also committed willful disobedience of the order of this Court as afore stated, in not placing the enquiry report under Section 81 of the Tamil Nadu Co-operative Societies Act,1983 before the Sanctioning Authority as directed by this Court in the order referred to above. The act of the Sanctioning Authority in non perusal of the enquiry report amounts to non-application of mind, because the enquiry under Section 81 of Tamil Nadu Co-operative Societies Act,1983 which was initiated as against the first accused Mr. K.Velusamy was ended in his favour, wherein it was specifically found that no pecuniary loss was caused to the Society by the first accused and therefore, he was relieved of all the charges. It is also specifically stated in the enquiry report under Section 81 of the Tamil Nadu Co-operative Societies Act,1983 that since there was no misappropriation, malpractices and falsification of records, there is no necessity to initiate criminal proceedings against the first accused Mr. K.Velusamy.
Madras High Court Cites 61 - Cited by 0 - T Mathivanan - Full Document

Mr. K. Velusamy vs State By Inspector Of Police on 24 May, 2017

36. The candid admission of the Sanctioning Authority, viz., L.W.1 Mr. K. Bharathan, Additional Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Chennai Region amounts to willful disobedience of the order of this Court. Not only he, but the act of the Investigating Officer viz., L.W.60 Mr. C.Sudarsan had also committed willful disobedience of the order of this Court as afore stated, in not placing the enquiry report under Section 81 of the Tamil Nadu Co-operative Societies Act,1983 before the Sanctioning Authority as directed by this Court in the order referred to above. The act of the Sanctioning Authority in non perusal of the enquiry report amounts to non-application of mind, because the enquiry under Section 81 of Tamil Nadu Co-operative Societies Act,1983 which was initiated as against the first accused Mr. K.Velusamy was ended in his favour, wherein it was specifically found that no pecuniary loss was caused to the Society by the first accused and therefore, he was relieved of all the charges. It is also specifically stated in the enquiry report under Section 81 of the Tamil Nadu Co-operative Societies Act,1983 that since there was no misappropriation, malpractices and falsification of records, there is no necessity to initiate criminal proceedings against the first accused Mr. K.Velusamy.
Madras High Court Cites 61 - Cited by 0 - T Mathivanan - Full Document

The State Of Maharashtra vs Bhimrao Bhaurao Halnor on 11 August, 2025

She also placed reliance on the decision of this Court in the cases of Bhagwan Jathya Bhoir v. The State of Maharashtra, 1992 CRI L.J. 1144; Narayan Baban Ingle v. State of Maharashtra, LAWS (BOM)-1993-4-74 ; Ishwar Piraj Kalpatri and others v. State of Maharashtra and others, 1993(1) Mh.LJ. 152; Doma and another v. The State of Maharashtra, {5} CRI APPEAL 121 OF 2006 - 1 1981 CRI L.J. 653; Madhukar s/o Gulabrao Khadse v. The State of Maharashtra, 2002 ALL MR (Cri) 1106, and decision of Madras High Court in the case of D.Venkatasan v. The State, 1997 CRI L.J. 1287.
Bombay High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1