Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 1 of 1 (0.18 seconds)

Beni Lal vs Polc Gurgaon And Anr on 20 August, 2015

No doubt the provisions of Section 36(4) of the Act, are mandatory in nature but the fact remains that as per ratio decidendi culled out by the Full Bench of this Court in Indrasan Parsad Vs. Presiding Officer and another 2008 (1)SCT 522 that consent of party must be specific and the leave by Court is to be sought at the beginning of proceedings so that there remains no ambiguity, however, impugned order suffers from illegality as trial court remained oblivious of provisions of Section 36(4) of the Act.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - A Rawal - Full Document
1