Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 448 (0.59 seconds)
Documents citing Gujarat State Road Transport ... vs Firoze M Mogal & on 26 December, 2013

Satishkumar Dhyalal Joshi vs Division Controller & on 22 January, 2015

3. A preliminary contention was raised by the  caveator on the aspect of maintainability of  the   Letters   Patent   Appeal   before   the  Division   Bench   under   Clause   15   of   the  Letters Patent by relying upon the judgment  of the Larger Bench of this Court in the case  of   Gujarat   State   Road   Transport  Corporation   versus   Firoze   M.   Mogal   and  another   reported   in   2014   (1)   GLH   (FB)  page   1   and   it   was   submitted   that   the  learned   Single   Judge   has   exercised   the  Page 3 of 13 C/CA/257/2015 ORDER power under Article 227 of the Constitution  and,   therefore,   the   appeal   may   not   be  maintainable.
Gujarat High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - K Jhaveri - Full Document

Rajesh Savdas Bhalani vs Divisional Controller & on 21 January, 2015

3. A preliminary contention was raised by the  caveator on the aspect of maintainability of  the   Letters   Patent   Appeal   before   the  Division   Bench   under   Clause   15   of   the  Letters Patent by relying upon the judgment  of the Larger Bench of this Court in the case  Page 3 of 13 C/LPA/1273/2014 ORDER of   Gujarat   State   Road   Transport  Corporation   versus   Firoze   M.   Mogal   and  another   reported   in   2014   (1)   GLH   (FB)  page   1   and   it   was   submitted   that   the  learned   Single   Judge   has   exercised   the  power under Article 227 of the Constitution  and,   therefore,   the   appeal   may   not   be  maintainable.
Gujarat High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - K Jhaveri - Full Document

Kishorbhai Mathurdas Kubavat vs Divisional Controller & on 28 January, 2015

3. A preliminary contention was raised by the  caveator on the aspect of maintainability of  the   Letters   Patent   Appeal   before   the  Division   Bench   under   Clause   15   of   the  Letters Patent by relying upon the judgment  of the Larger Bench of this Court in the case  of   Gujarat   State   Road   Transport  Corporation   versus   Firoze   M.   Mogal   and  Page 3 of 13 C/CA/835/2015 ORDER another   reported   in   2014   (1)   GLH   (FB)  page   1   and   it   was   submitted   that   the  learned   Single   Judge   has   exercised   the  power under Article 227 of the Constitution  and,   therefore,   the   appeal   may   not   be  maintainable.
Gujarat High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - K Jhaveri - Full Document

Ajaysinh Savjubha Chudasama vs Division Controller & on 21 January, 2015

3. A preliminary contention was raised by the  caveator on the aspect of maintainability of  the   Letters   Patent   Appeal   before   the  Division   Bench   under   Clause   15   of   the  Letters Patent by relying upon the judgment  of the Larger Bench of this Court in the case  of   Gujarat   State   Road   Transport  Corporation   versus   Firoze   M.   Mogal   and  another   reported   in   2014   (1)   GLH   (FB)  page   1   and   it   was   submitted   that   the  learned   Single   Judge   has   exercised   the  power under Article 227 of the Constitution  and,   therefore,   the   appeal   may   not   be  maintainable.
Gujarat High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - K Jhaveri - Full Document

Anand Municipality Through Chief ... vs Avinash Ravjibhai Meckwan & on 23 June, 2014

3. Learned counsel appearing for the appellant has urged that in the writ petition, originally the Labour Court was joined as party - respondent. However, thereafter as per the direction of the Court, the Labour Court was deleted as party - respondent in the writ petition. Hence, the present Letters Patent Appeal is maintainable and the decision of Full Bench in the case of Gujarat State Road Transport Corporation v. Firoze M. Mogal and another, 2014 GLH 1 will not be applicable in the facts of the case.
Gujarat High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - V M Sahai - Full Document

Director District Rural Deve. Agency & vs Kishorkumar D Tank & on 28 March, 2014

6. It is further submitted by the counsel for the appellants that the Five Judges Full Bench decision of this Court in the case of Gujarat State Road Transport Corporation v. Firoze M. Mogal and another, 2014 GLH 1 rendered in Letters Patent Appeal No. 1149 of 2002, Dated : 26.12.2013 would not be applicable to the facts of this case as the prayer in the writ petition was for issuance of writ of certiorari.
Gujarat High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - K Thaker - Full Document

Vijaybhai Kantibhai Patel vs Jangleshwar Mahadev Trust & 2 on 4 February, 2015

9. Mr.Sanjanwala, learned counsel appearing for the  appellant   submitted   that   when   the   appeal   was  admitted, the interim relief was granted, but now  in   view   of   the   Larger   Bench   decision   of   this  Court in Gujarat State Road Transport Corporation  Vs.   Firoze   M.   Mogal   (supra),   if   this   Court   is  inclined to take the view that the appeal is not  maintainable,   the   interim   relief   granted  Page 8 of 9 C/LPA/628/2010 ORDER observing   that   the   transaction   if   any   shall   be  subject   to   the   further   orders   of   this   court   be  continued.
Gujarat High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Naresh Babulal Dave vs Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation on 1 September, 2017

3. The said order has become final. The Misc. Civil Application is filed seeking prayer for revival of the appeal, on the ground that subsequently, Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Jogendrasinhji Vijaysinghji Vs. State of Gujarat reported in 2015(2) GLH 584 has set aside the order of this Court in the case of Gujarat State Road Transport Corporation Vs. Firoze Mogal and Another reported in 2014(1) GLH 1.
Gujarat High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 1 - R S Reddy - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next